| Revision as of 15:12, 29 July 2006 editSoman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers93,520 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:15, 29 July 2006 edit undoSoman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers93,520 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :Nonsense. The wordings on the controversy are like copied from a Hindutva website. Why is there no actual main stream media references on the issue? Why has the pro-RSS editors not chosen to write a single line on how the issue started? (as a labour conflict, with Ramdev's own volunteers striking for minimum wage) why is there no mention that the claim of human body parts was brought up not by karat, but by the dismissed volunteers? why is there no mention that the test made on Ramdevs medicines confirmed presence of animal substances? And finally, please talk about Hindus as a politically uniform group or claim that RSS has the right to speak on behalf of Hindus worldwide. --] 15:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | :Nonsense. The wordings on the controversy are like copied from a Hindutva website. Why is there no actual main stream media references on the issue? Why has the pro-RSS editors not chosen to write a single line on how the issue started? (as a labour conflict, with Ramdev's own volunteers striking for minimum wage) why is there no mention that the claim of human body parts was brought up not by karat, but by the dismissed volunteers? why is there no mention that the test made on Ramdevs medicines confirmed presence of animal substances? And finally, please talk about Hindus as a politically uniform group or claim that RSS has the right to speak on behalf of Hindus worldwide. --] 15:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :See for a comprehensive overview of the issue. --] 15:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | :See for a comprehensive overview of the issue. --] 15:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Moreover, the wording 'otherwise supportive' is purely fictional. CPI(M) gives conditional support the UPA government. But the Congress and CPI(M) are hardly that close, and are in fierce competion in the Left-ruled states. --] 15:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:15, 29 July 2006
This page looks like an Left PoV whitepaper on Brinda Karat's life :"when she returned she knew". Does not subscribe to the wikipedia standards of quality. Someone Kindly update with more objective viewpoint.
You need the condemnation to show the aftermath of her attack on Baba Ramdev and how she hurt the sentiment of Hindus. The left backed down on the issue after that, therefore there is no counter-response.Bakaman%% 15:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nonsense. The wordings on the controversy are like copied from a Hindutva website. Why is there no actual main stream media references on the issue? Why has the pro-RSS editors not chosen to write a single line on how the issue started? (as a labour conflict, with Ramdev's own volunteers striking for minimum wage) why is there no mention that the claim of human body parts was brought up not by karat, but by the dismissed volunteers? why is there no mention that the test made on Ramdevs medicines confirmed presence of animal substances? And finally, please talk about Hindus as a politically uniform group or claim that RSS has the right to speak on behalf of Hindus worldwide. --Soman 15:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- See for a comprehensive overview of the issue. --Soman 15:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Moreover, the wording 'otherwise supportive' is purely fictional. CPI(M) gives conditional support the UPA government. But the Congress and CPI(M) are hardly that close, and are in fierce competion in the Left-ruled states. --Soman 15:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)