Misplaced Pages

User talk:GaeusOctavius: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:12, 29 July 2006 editBodera (talk | contribs)33 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:33, 29 July 2006 edit undoBodera (talk | contribs)33 edits →Malicious gossipNext edit →
Line 27: Line 27:
Regards, --] 22:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Regards, --] 22:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


== Malicious gossiper == == Malicious gossip ==
Why are you spreading malicious gossip about high energy physicists on Misplaced Pages? Why are you spreading malicious gossip on high energy physicists on Misplaced Pages?

Revision as of 20:33, 29 July 2006

Welcome!

Hello GaeusOctavius, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  HGB 07:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)


Daniel Friedan

He sounds like an interesting person. Could you supply references for this article and perhaps a bibliography if he has published.TheRingess 07:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Strange Edits

Hi. I just noticed (and reverted) some disparaging remarks about conservatives you put into the Kathryn Jean Lopez article. A quick check through your contributions found a mixture of good-seeming edits plus stuff like , and I'm really puzzled by . Um, what's going on? Are you all right? If you need to vent like that, perhaps you should consider starting a blog.

I'll watch this page for a week or so, so if you want to reply, you can do so here.

Best wishes, CWC(talk) 21:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for your feedback. In regards to KJL, I fail to see how it is disparaging to point out that she has an abnormally high I.Q. (for and American political conservative). Most people would consider a high I.Q. to be a positive attribute, but perhaps this is not the case within certain subcultures. In regards to your second point, I have actually heard Kaus on the radio on multiple occassions, and the words "nasal" and "grating" are accurate descriptors. I am just being objective. When someone broadcasts over the radio on a semiprofessional basis, I believe it is entirely appropriate to note his vocal qualities.

Regards, --GaeusOctavius 22:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Malicious gossip

Why are you spreading malicious gossip on high energy physicists on Misplaced Pages?