Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
If it will make you happy. I consider the ] to have failed in the sense that !votes were re-factored in a way that would allow the nominator to later claim that no reason was given for the !votes. In the narrower sense of seeking the answer to a question, it succeeded in showing that there was a majority against change. Please don't push this any farther, it's not achieving anything. ] (]) 17:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
::There was space provided for anyone who wanted to submit a reason to their objection. They chose not to. The RFC was a mess because there was no clear objective as to what was being proposed. Despite this, 11 users still objected, even though they weren't sure what they were objecting to. Lol.] (]) 17:51, 18 June 2015 (UTC)