Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:14, 21 June 2015

WP:CANVASS

Your post here is inappropriate as it violates WP:CANVASS and the article is not under the scope of the project. This is a policy violation. Don't edit war. If you want to choose not to cooperate, then we can discuss your conduct with an administrator. Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Do no delete my comments, I read WP:CANVASS, says "In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus." 82.11.33.86 (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

No, it is not. You need to read and understand WP:CANVASS. If you want to broaden participation and maximise relevant input, you should post at the Pakistan, Iran or Afghanistan noticeboards. The article in question is not under the scope of the noticeboard where you are posting, and comes under canvassing. I am going to revert you. Your edit warring is non-productive; it seems you have been in conflict with several users as your talk page shows as well as several articles. If you persist with this attitude, there is a strong chance you would not be able to last long. Please read up core Misplaced Pages policies and educate yourself. Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Do not remove my comments, is 3rr violation. 82.11.33.86 (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

No, it is not a 3RR violation. This is not an article, this is a noticeboard used for discussion, which you are using inappropriately. Also, read up WP:3RR, which applies when there are more than 3 reverts (you've made the same reverts). Once again, please take heed of the advice given to you and stop gaming with the system. Mar4d (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

I search on talkpage rules, you breaking them. WP:TPO 82.11.33.86 (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

It may be a friendly notice, but its still canvassing because it is indiscriminate cross-posting to an unrelated subject. Pakistan has nothing to do with India. The next time you canvass someone I will take you to ANI. --TL22 (talk) 18:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

And you are crying wolf again despite being told not to. In any case you have been blocked for 1RR violation. --TL22 (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Blocked?

@Bbb23: I was not told of WP:ARBPIA or 1rr. How do I know? 82.11.33.86 (talk) 18:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

When you edited the page, there was a big colorful warning at the top in a box letting you know that what you were doing was sanctionable.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

@Bbb23: I did not see it? Was no intentional. 82.11.33.86 (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

And what Gulf war has to do with Palestine-Israel? 82.11.33.86 (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

WP:ARBPIA block

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."