Revision as of 21:12, 27 June 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Ed Miliband/Archive 3) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:14, 5 July 2015 edit undo31.185.228.194 (talk) Article as of July 2015 needs shorteningNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
] (]) 03:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC){{Talk header|search=yes}} | |||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} | |||
{{Article history| action1 = GAN | {{Article history| action1 = GAN | ||
| action1date = 15 July 2011 | | action1date = 15 July 2011 | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
::: For what it's worth, I'm currently working through to flesh out the 2012-2014 years which are a bit bare at the moment. Can hopefully include some of the Wintour article too. ] (]) 15:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | ::: For what it's worth, I'm currently working through to flesh out the 2012-2014 years which are a bit bare at the moment. Can hopefully include some of the Wintour article too. ] (]) 15:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::Looks like quite a useful book, and great work so far btw. ] (]) 20:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | ::::Looks like quite a useful book, and great work so far btw. ] (]) 20:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
This article is overlong for a has-been,needs editing. |
Revision as of 03:14, 5 July 2015
31.185.228.194 (talk) 03:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ed Miliband article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Ed Miliband has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The undoing of Ed Miliband
Quite an interesting piece from The Guardian here that might be worth using in this article. This is Paul (talk) 21:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- It's a good article, but I'm struggling to find notable facts that can be used. Any ideas? SocialDem (talk) 13:29, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- A few things spring to mind, although without reading through the Misplaced Pages article again, I don't know if we've used them already. But here goes:
- There's the disastrous party conference speech in which he forgot to mention the economy.
- Labour's apparent lack of direction before and during the election campaign.
- Making reasonably good points about the direction of the coalition that were often never followed up.
- The so-called Ed Stone.
- Tory speculation of a Labour-SNP coalition.
- Forget now, but I think they may also have mentioned a lack of narrative post-2010 that allowed the coalition to blame Labour for creating a world recession.
- Possibly not all of this would be relevant here, but I'm happy to read through this again at some point in the next few days and make more suggestions. Cheers, This is Paul (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- A few things spring to mind, although without reading through the Misplaced Pages article again, I don't know if we've used them already. But here goes:
- Thanks, some of these are good points and could do with inclusion. Guess I'm reluctant to use too much stuff based on "he said, she said", so I think it's worth looking for supporting sources.
- For what it's worth, I'm currently working through this book to flesh out the 2012-2014 years which are a bit bare at the moment. Can hopefully include some of the Wintour article too. SocialDem (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Looks like quite a useful book, and great work so far btw. This is Paul (talk) 20:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I'm currently working through this book to flesh out the 2012-2014 years which are a bit bare at the moment. Can hopefully include some of the Wintour article too. SocialDem (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
This article is overlong for a has-been,needs editing.
Categories:- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford articles
- Low-importance University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Top-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class Yorkshire articles
- High-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles
- GA-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- GA-Class organized labour articles
- Mid-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- GA-Class socialism articles
- High-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English