Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 05:29, 4 July 2015

Fine work

Hi Handpolk, just wanted to mention I'm glad to see the earnest work you're doing in the areas you're editing in now, although do consider that the advice you've been getting from the experienced editors there may be good to take. Regarding the Invitation section above, you should feel free to remove the section from your User Talk if you'd like. Zad68 14:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I gather you mean Statue of Liberty? Dealing with conflict is not my strong suit. The topic ban is probably for the best. Handpolk (talk) 15:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Talk Message

Everytime he trades a player do we put it on his wikipedia? Or even when he attempts or wants to? Cause he also wants to trade Rudy Gay and there's no way they are trading Cousins. So why don't we write about whrn he wanted to trade igoudala in 2007 and when he traded JR Smith or Carmelo Anthony? How does Cousins differ from that and how is it important that he wants to trade him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toeknee44 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 23 June 2015‎ (UTC)

I would have no problem with you adding any of those things, particularly the Carmelo Anthony trade. Theoretically any time a reliable source writes about him, that's a candidate for inclusion in the article. Are you aware of any policy or guideline that says otherwise? Because your objections seem based on your own original research (i.e. knowledge of basketball). And that doesn't factor into the editing process. Handpolk (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

FYI. This was left on your User page, I've moved it here and signed it. — Strongjam (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

That was very kind of you. Handpolk (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

I try to be helpful. — Strongjam (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Golden State Warriors

Sorry, but you're wrong. Your edit is vandalism. That sentence The Warriors are the current NBA champions, defeating the Cleveland Cavaliers in six games in the 2015 Finals. is IRRELEVANT. And I will continue to REVERT this edit, because that has no place there! Sabbatino (talk) 12:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I made some research and that edit was made on JUNE 17 and it's irrelevant. Here's that revision's info - 07:01, 17 June 2015‎ DavidSteinle (talk | contribs)‎ . . (69,160 bytes) (+169). I wonder how noone saw that garbage sooner. You can report me, but I'm right by reverting that edit. Sabbatino (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

You seriously think it's irrelevant they are the current NBA Champions? Is that some sort of joke? Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I added this to the talk page. I don't anticipate it will take long for consensus to collectively laugh at you, as I have. Maybe you should go to Barack Obama and remove that he is President of the United States, you probably think that's irrelevant, too. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

You clearly don't understand why that idiotic statement has no place in there. And everyone will laugh at you when there's a consensus. And why I should do something to Obama's article? Don't start an argument which you will lose. Sabbatino (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

You're right, I don't have any idea why that 'idiotic' statement has no place in there. And you've yet to explain why in a way that makes me understand. Let's move this to the article talk page. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration appeal

Hey. There's a template here for appealing arbitration enforcement sanctions. You may wish to reformat your request- alternatively, I'll do it for you if you'd like? PeterTheFourth has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 09:15, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

If you can do it i'd appreciate it. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Embarassing- GoldenRing had already generously done it. Anyway, it's good now. PeterTheFourth has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 09:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

No problem. GoldenRing (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

RfA

A bit of bedtime reading for you. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

"This essay contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors" -- like I disagreed with your opinion, I disagree with theirs. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

July 2015

Your recent editing history at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Steve Badger (poker player) (2nd nomination) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Banner talk 05:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)