Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dubs boy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:36, 21 July 2015 editDubs boy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users534 edits Harassment on my talk page← Previous edit Revision as of 01:56, 27 July 2015 edit undoCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits WP:TROUBLES Final Warning: new sectionNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:


:They want blood. They are happy to turn a blind eye to the actions of users on "their side". Its disappointing that they are so set on a battle ground mentality. A belated welcome to wikipedia none the less.] (]) 14:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC) :They want blood. They are happy to turn a blind eye to the actions of users on "their side". Its disappointing that they are so set on a battle ground mentality. A belated welcome to wikipedia none the less.] (]) 14:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

== ] Final Warning ==

Dubs Boy, I was coming here to issue a warning regarding your conduct over the past 2 weeks at Talk:Derry, however, your last edit has made matters worse.<br>Cease casting ] about other editors in discussions on wikipedia. ] on others ('']'') and restrict your discourse to ''how to improve articles''. The conduct that brought about this warning includes re-inserting personal attacks made by others and engaging in ''ad hominem'' of your own at ], a page covered by the WP:TROUBLES RfAr (if you were not aware that this page is under ] then you are now). You have also repeated some of the above behaviors on my talk page and at ANI. Note also that the fact none of my colleagues acted upon that ANi thread does not equate with you being vindicated or your actions being compatible with the WP:TROUBLES RfAr or basic WP policy.<br>Demanding sources be "open access" is ], and furthermore demanding that someone from your side of an argument (support/oppose) confirm sources is ] behaviour.<br>Lastly, you also once again facilitated trolling by others on ]. The ] created ] to troll that page and was blocked accordingly by Ricky81682. You, as shown in diffs above, re-inserted trolling/''ad hominem'' made by them. Enabling trolling by others was a behaviour I explicitly warned you against repeating 10 months ago. That warning was clear and yet you have chosen to ignore it. Again I say to you the choice is yours, abide by site policy or your editing privileges will be revoked.<br>This is your last and final warning in relation to *any* articles relating to, or content on other pages related to, the ] ruling. You will be sanctioned appropraitely if you continue to:
#Engage in persistent civility
#Resort to repeated and protracted ''ad hominem''
#Cast aspersions about other editors
#Indulge in tendentiousness
And to be absolutely clear, sanctions will follow if you engage in any other actions incompatible with the WP:TROUBLES RfAr, or wikipedia's other ] or ]. I have been as clear and as patient as I can be with you Dubs Boy but these issues above are a pattern of behaviour with you Dubs Boy that goes back years (to 2012) and given the long history here there will be no further warnings--] <sup>]</sup> 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:56, 27 July 2015

Harassment on my talk page

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Harassment on my talk page. Thank you. Scolaire (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

ScolaireWhatever happened to this incident?Dubs boy (talk) 18:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Are you trying to force me to post on your talk page? Scolaire (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
I cant make you do anything you don't want to. I'm just wondering what happened to the ANI?
I was just having a laugh. The thread was archived, because the admins weren't interested. Scolaire (talk) 08:30, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
So you tried to get me blocked, for a laugh? I think next time you go to ANI, try and present the facts and not a skewed mock up of events. I thought it was weird that Highking came out of no where to support your comments, having not edited in 3 months. What is the link between you and Highking?Dubs boy (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Boy, you really work hard at getting things wrong! I said "Are you trying to force me to post on your talk page" for a laugh. I didn't take you to ANI for a laugh. I was seriously pissed off at the way you kept bugging me. I'm not going to get into whether I presented the facts correctly or not. (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Your last statement says it all. "Facts" were noticeably ignored in an attempt to get me blocked. As i presented, it was you who was actually bugging me. Trying to get another user blocked is no laughing matter. I think you have shown your true colours and POV.Dubs boy (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
: There is no "link" between me and HighKing. We haven't interacted for a long time. When we did, we disagreed at least as often as we agreed. I assume he posted on the article talk page because he had something to say, and he posted on ANI because he had something to say there, too.
Now, if you don't mind, I don't want to have any more discussion with you. Goodbye and happy editing. Scolaire (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Something smells a bit off.Dubs boy (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Goodbye and happy editing. Scolaire (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Dubs Boy, it's because I forgot my pass word. so I had to start again. Text Julian (talk) 21:19, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

That makes sense. Nothing to worry about then. Common sense should prevail, though this is wikipedia where common sense is considered contrabandDubs boy (talk) 21:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

These guys seem quite determined to block all opposition to their agenda. I don't know what that editor means by 'opened ani' but it is so indirect and avoiding of the important issues, that it must surely be a threat to comply. Text Julian (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

They want blood. They are happy to turn a blind eye to the actions of users on "their side". Its disappointing that they are so set on a battle ground mentality. A belated welcome to wikipedia none the less.Dubs boy (talk) 14:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

WP:TROUBLES Final Warning

Dubs Boy, I was coming here to issue a warning regarding your conduct over the past 2 weeks at Talk:Derry, however, your last edit has made matters worse.
Cease casting aspersions about other editors in discussions on wikipedia. Stop commenting on others (ad hominem) and restrict your discourse to how to improve articles. The conduct that brought about this warning includes re-inserting personal attacks made by others and engaging in ad hominem of your own at Talk:Derry, a page covered by the WP:TROUBLES RfAr (if you were not aware that this page is under discretionary sanctions then you are now). You have also repeated some of the above behaviors on my talk page and at ANI. Note also that the fact none of my colleagues acted upon that ANi thread does not equate with you being vindicated or your actions being compatible with the WP:TROUBLES RfAr or basic WP policy.
Demanding sources be "open access" is tendentious, and furthermore demanding that someone from your side of an argument (support/oppose) confirm sources is battleground behaviour.
Lastly, you also once again facilitated trolling by others on Talk:Derry. The User:Ring Julian created User:Text Julian to troll that page and was blocked accordingly by Ricky81682. You, as shown in diffs above, re-inserted trolling/ad hominem made by them. Enabling trolling by others was a behaviour I explicitly warned you against repeating 10 months ago. That warning was clear and yet you have chosen to ignore it. Again I say to you the choice is yours, abide by site policy or your editing privileges will be revoked.
This is your last and final warning in relation to *any* articles relating to, or content on other pages related to, the WP:TROUBLES ruling. You will be sanctioned appropraitely if you continue to:

  1. Engage in persistent civility
  2. Resort to repeated and protracted ad hominem
  3. Cast aspersions about other editors
  4. Indulge in tendentiousness

And to be absolutely clear, sanctions will follow if you engage in any other actions incompatible with the WP:TROUBLES RfAr, or wikipedia's other content or conduct policies. I have been as clear and as patient as I can be with you Dubs Boy but these issues above are a pattern of behaviour with you Dubs Boy that goes back years (to 2012) and given the long history here there will be no further warnings--Cailil 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)