Revision as of 10:44, 4 August 2015 view sourceLankiveil (talk | contribs)27,123 edits create initial PD talk page | Revision as of 21:46, 15 September 2015 view source S Marshall (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers32,394 edits Is this normal?Next edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Casenav}} | {{Casenav}} | ||
==S Marshall== | |||
I'm sorry, I'm unfamiliar with Arbcom. Is this long silence normal?—] <small>]/]</small> 21:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:46, 15 September 2015
Therefore, with the exception of arbitrators and clerks, all editors must create a section for their statement and comment only in their own section. |
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
---|
Open proceedings |
Active sanctions |
Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
S Marshall
I'm sorry, I'm unfamiliar with Arbcom. Is this long silence normal?—S Marshall T/C 21:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)