Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Editor conduct in e-cigs articles Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:44, 4 August 2015 view sourceLankiveil (talk | contribs)27,123 edits create initial PD talk page  Revision as of 21:46, 15 September 2015 view source S Marshall (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers32,394 edits Is this normal?Next edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
}} }}
{{Casenav}} {{Casenav}}

==S Marshall==
I'm sorry, I'm unfamiliar with Arbcom. Is this long silence normal?—] <small>]/]</small> 21:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:46, 15 September 2015

Information icon with black background.
This page is for statements regarding the proposed decision, not discussion.
Therefore, with the exception of arbitrators and clerks, all editors must create a section for their statement and comment only in their own section.
Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD

Misplaced Pages Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

S Marshall

I'm sorry, I'm unfamiliar with Arbcom. Is this long silence normal?—S Marshall T/C 21:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)