Misplaced Pages

User talk:Flobberz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:28, 12 August 2015 editConifer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,663 edits Explanation of notability: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 05:32, 12 August 2015 edit undoFlobberz (talk | contribs)125 edits Explanation of notabilityNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


:So then it's not suitable for inclusion. ] (]) 05:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC) :So then it's not suitable for inclusion. ] (]) 05:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:Except that it really is; Misplaced Pages simply has unrealistic standards. --] (]) 05:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:32, 12 August 2015

Deletion discussion about FreeWorldGroup

Hello, Flobberz,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether FreeWorldGroup should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/FreeWorldGroup .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Conifer (talk) 05:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Explanation of notability

To include an article about a company on Misplaced Pages, there have to be multiple reliable, independent sources that have written about the company. That means newspaper articles or books. LinkedIn doesn't qualify because except in rare circumstances, social media websites are not reliable sources, and neither that nor references written by the owner are independent of the company. Conifer (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

There aren't any. What do you want from me? I can't just majiik up some news articles for you mate I'm not Jesus. --Flobberz (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

So then it's not suitable for inclusion. Conifer (talk) 05:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Except that it really is; Misplaced Pages simply has unrealistic standards. --Flobberz (talk) 05:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)