| Revision as of 19:44, 4 August 2006 editJoeblakesley (talk | contribs)4,988 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:05, 5 September 2006 edit undoRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits {{historical}}, not an active proposalNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{historical}} | |||
| {{proposed|]<br>]}} | |||
| '''Hatnotes''' are short notes placed at the top of an article before the primary topic, generally to provide 1) disambiguation of closely related terms or 2) to summarise a topic, and explain its boundaries. | '''Hatnotes''' are short notes placed at the top of an article before the primary topic, generally to provide 1) disambiguation of closely related terms or 2) to summarise a topic, and explain its boundaries. | ||
| "Hatnote" is also a polite term to refer to '''improper disambiguation links''' which exceed standard length, link directly to trivial topics (ie on "War" "''For the band, see '''War (band)'''''") instead of a disambiguation page, ] to Misplaced Pages, or otherwise misuses of the disambiguation scheme which can be regarded as link-]. | "Hatnote" is also a polite term to refer to '''improper disambiguation links''' which exceed standard length, link directly to trivial topics (ie on "War" "''For the band, see '''War (band)'''''") instead of a disambiguation page, ] to Misplaced Pages, or otherwise misuses of the disambiguation scheme which can be regarded as link-]. | ||
Revision as of 21:05, 5 September 2006
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Hatnotes are short notes placed at the top of an article before the primary topic, generally to provide 1) disambiguation of closely related terms or 2) to summarise a topic, and explain its boundaries. "Hatnote" is also a polite term to refer to improper disambiguation links which exceed standard length, link directly to trivial topics (ie on "War" "For the band, see War (band)") instead of a disambiguation page, self-references to Misplaced Pages, or otherwise misuses of the disambiguation scheme which can be regarded as link-spam.
Note: The dispute regarding the proper usage of summaries and extended disambiguation notes, is currently unresolved (see #Summarize or not? below). Most agree that they should be limited to the simplest possible form, preferably only linking to a standard ] page, allowing slightly more extensive hatnotes are warranted in certain cases. This style guideline is intended to make this process more efficient by giving article pages a consistent look, and avoiding distracting information (such as extraneous links).
Format
In most cases, a standard Misplaced Pages:Disambiguation template should be used. This permits the form and structure to change gracefully and uniformly over time. Currently, each note should be italicized and indented, without a bullet before the item. A horizontal dividing line should not be placed under a note, nor after the final item in a list.
Summarize or not?
Currently there is an ongoing dispute as to whether hatnote disambiguation templates should include a brief summary of the article's topic in their first sentence if they refer to "other uses". For instance, consider the article Honey. One type of hatnote, exemplified by {{otheruses4}}, would be along the lines of:
- This article is about the insect-produced fluid. For other uses of the term, see Honey (disambiguation).
The other type, exemplified by {{otheruses3}}, would omit the first sentence, leaving the hatnote like:
- For other uses of the term, see Honey (disambiguation).
Pro-summarizers argue that it's confusing and bad style to write the hatnote such that the reader must read the words "other uses", look down a line, and read the first sentence or paragraph before being able to understand what the "other uses" actually refers to. Anti-summarizers feel, on the other hand, that it's pointless and annoying to duplicate a description that should be in the lead paragraph anyway.
Note that this argument is inapplicable to cases where only one other use exists. If the phrase "other uses" does not exist, it would appear no one would strongly favor including an article summary, so it's best to use a template such as {{for}}. (See, for instance, Kubla Khan.)
At present, this dispute is unresolved. Therefore, according to general Misplaced Pages precedent, it would be best to avoid changing over the style used in any given article until consensus is reached (if it ever is; see the AD-CE dispute for a case where this situation is perpetual).
Placement
Place hatnotes at the very top of the article, before images and templates (like navigational and "series" templates). For example, don't do this:
] <-- article content
{{otheruses}} <-- meta content
A '''frog''' is an animal <-- article content
- In terms of document structure, it is awkward to have article content, then meta content, then article content again. Analogously, in HTML it would be bad form to put <title> and <meta> tags within <body>.
- In terms of accessibility, not everyone is using or has the CSS functionality that "floats" images and templates to the right or left, which in turn gives many people the perception that a hatnote placed after an image or template looks OK. Imagine if someone without CSS landed on this version of the Bread article but happened to be in the wrong place. They'd have to scroll, or perhaps in the case of a blind user, have their screen reader trodge through a long "cuisine" template before reaching the navigation aid they desire. Likewise, those who redistribute Misplaced Pages content may choose to change or eliminate CSS entirely. (To test the CSS-less realm in Firefox, go to View, Page Style, No Style.)
- Similarly, Wikipedians may decide to change the look of the hatnote templates in the future, like how it is currently done on the German Misplaced Pages. If such a change were made, hatnotes that look fine now despite not being at the very top of the article would visually clash with proximate images and templates.
Examples of proper use
Two articles with the same title
- This article is about the village in England. For H. P. Lovecraft's fictional town, see Dunwich (Lovecraft).
Dunwich (pronounced Dun-Itch) is a town in the county of Suffolk in England, the remnant of what was once a prosperous seaport and centre of the wool trade during the early middle ages, with a natural harbour formed by the mouths of the River Blyth...
When two articles share the same title, the unambiguated article should include a hatnote with a link to the other article. It is not necessary to create a separate disambiguation page.
Linking to a disambiguation page
- For other uses, see Monolith (disambiguation).
A monolith is a monument or natural feature such as a mountain, consisting of a single massive stone or rock. Erosion usually exposes these formations...
When a word has a primary meaning and two or more additional meanings, the hatnote should show a link to a disambiguation page.
Proper noun linking to a disambiguation page
- This article is about the mazelike labyrinth from Greek mythology. For other uses of the term, see Labyrinth (disambiguation).
In Greek mythology, the Labyrinth was an elaborate maze-like structure constructed for King Minos of Crete and designed by the legendary artificer Daedalus to hold the Minotaur...
When a word is a proper noun but has two or more additional meanings, the hatnote may include a brief description and a link to a disambiguation page.
Examples of improper use
Trivial information, dictionary definitions, and slang
When notes feature a trivial detail or use of a term, or links to overly specific and tendentious material, they are unwarranted.
- During a siege, to invest a town or fortress means to surround it with a contravallation and a circumvallation.
Investment is a term with several closely-related meanings in finance and economics. It refers to the accumulation of some kind of asset in hopes of getting a future return from it...
In this case, there is no direct disambiguation, and the note listed is bound to be uninteresting to most readers. The proper disambiguation simply links to a separate Invest (disambiguation) page.
Legitimate information about the topic
A previous version of the Aisha article showed:
- Ayesha is sometimes used as a woman's name. Once popular only among Muslims, it was briefly popular among English-speakers after it appeared in the book She by Rider Haggard.
Aisha or Ayesha (Arabic عائشه `ā'isha = "she who lives") was a wife of the Islamic prophet Muhammad...
This is a typical and highly improper misuse of disambiguating hatnotes. Instead, the information belongs in the body of the article, or in the articles about the book, or in a separate article about names, or all three places.
Linking to articles that are highly related to the topic
- This article is about the scientific study of extraterrestrial life; for treatment in popular culture, see Extraterrestrial life in popular culture.
Extraterrestrial life is life that may exist and originate outside the planet Earth. Its existence is currently hypothetical: there is as yet no evidence of extraterrestrial life that has been widely accepted by scientists...
Instead of using a hatnote, it is better to summarize Extraterrestrial life in popular culture under a subsection of Extraterrestrial life in conjunction with the {{main}} template. Alternatively it could be linked to in the See also section.
Disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous
Tree (set theory)that anyone can edit.
- For other uses, see tree (disambiguation).
In set theory, a tree is a partially ordered set (poset) in which there is a single unique minimal element (called the root) and in which the set of elements less than a given element is well ordered...
Here, the problem is that the user would not have ended up at tree (set theory) if they were interested in other types of trees, as tree does not redirect there.
External links
A previous version of the Hurricane Katrina article contained:
- If you are trying to locate someone missing in Hurricane Katrina, or register yourself as found, you can use the site www.disastersearch.org
Hurricane Katrina, which made landfall near New Orleans, Louisiana, on August 29, 2005, was one of the most destructive and expensive tropical cyclones to hit the United States...
The use of external help links in Misplaced Pages, though noble, cannot reasonably be maintained. In special cases, a link to an "External links" section with several links may be appropriate, but POV favoritism can be obstructive. In this case, the hatnote was removed entirely.
Templates
| Template | Syntax | Expansion | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| {{Distinguish}} | {{Distinguish}} | Not to be confused with ]. Not to be confused with Headwarenotes. |
Useful when two pages have confusingly similar names (such as French Guinea and French Guiana) |
| {{Distinguish2}} | {{Distinguish2}} | Not to be confused with {{{1}}}. Template:Distinguish2 |
As above, but when a further explanation seems useful (such as Antimony and Antinomy); or there is more than one similar name (such as Henry Strachey (explorer), Henry Strachey (artist), etc). |
See also
- Template:This article is about (talk)
- Template:this (talk)
- Template:dablink (talk)
- Template:disambig (talk)