Revision as of 20:54, 3 October 2015 editDennis Bratland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,245 editsm →October 2015: ty← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:07, 3 October 2015 edit undoSkyring (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,591 edits Dennis, I've asked you several times not to harass me on my talk page. If it's about an article, use the article talk. If it's another fake warning, why not take it to ANI or similar. Please stop.Next edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 33879 --> ] (]) 00:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 33879 --> ] (]) 00:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
== October 2015 == | |||
] Please stop your ]. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at ], you may be ]. ''<P> is another example of ] on this article. Every single edit you have made to this article, and every single talk page comment, has been biased in one direction only: to improve VW's public image and soften, whitewash, or simply delete any negative information about VW. Please try to find neutrality between '''all''' points of view rather than only push one POV.<P>You have been warned many times for tendentious editing.''<!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> ] (]) 20:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
*The the stock price fall was discussed , you had nothing to say. When the proposed data was put there, you took no interest and found no fault. When the graph and table yesterday, no problem from anyone. But '''today''' a hot 26 minutes after I reverted your tendenitious edits and warned you about your POV pushing, all of a sudden that this stock data is unsourced. These are of course public records where numerious sources etc can easily verify the numbers given. Note that ''"{{Citation needed}} (also known by the redirects {{Cn}} and {{Fact}}) is a template used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source.'' These stock prices are not "questionable"; they are common knowledge and easily cited. Instead you escalate rather than simply fixing the "problem" of a lack of citation, or better yet, go find something important to help make the article better.<P>It is ] that your actions are due to your use of ] for the purpose of carrying on grudges rather than ].<P>Please find a productive use of your time that makes an article better rather than trying to fight with other editors. --] (]) 20:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:07, 3 October 2015
Please comment on Talk:Grand Duchy of Lithuania
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)