| Revision as of 21:07, 3 October 2015 editSkyring (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,591 edits Dennis, I've asked you several times not to harass me on my talk page. If it's about an article, use the article talk. If it's another fake warning, why not take it to ANI or similar. Please stop.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:14, 3 October 2015 edit undoDennis Bratland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,245 edits Undid revision 683989507 by Skyring (talk) reply to previous edit summary, point out yet another instance of useless fightingNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 33879 --> ] (]) 00:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 33879 --> ] (]) 00:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == October 2015 == | |||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at ], you may be ]. ''<P> is another example of ] on this article. Every single edit you have made to this article, and every single talk page comment, has been biased in one direction only: to improve VW's public image and soften, whitewash, or simply delete any negative information about VW. Please try to find neutrality between '''all''' points of view rather than only push one POV.<P>You have been warned many times for tendentious editing.''<!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> ] (]) 20:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| *The the stock price fall was discussed , you had nothing to say. When the proposed data was put there, you took no interest and found no fault. When the graph and table yesterday, no problem from anyone. But '''today''' a hot 26 minutes after I reverted your tendenitious edits and warned you about your POV pushing, all of a sudden that this stock data is unsourced. These are of course public records where numerious sources etc can easily verify the numbers given. Note that ''"{{Citation needed}} (also known by the redirects {{Cn}} and {{Fact}}) is a template used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source.'' These stock prices are not "questionable"; they are common knowledge and easily cited. Instead you escalate rather than simply fixing the "problem" of a lack of citation, or better yet, go find something important to help make the article better.<P>It is ] that your actions are due to your use of ] for the purpose of carrying on grudges rather than ].<P>Please find a productive use of your time that makes an article better rather than trying to fight with other editors. --] (]) 20:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * "Please stop" you ask, in your edit summary? Nope, not stopping, am I? Please stop your disruptive editing and there would be no need of these warnings. Put aside your personal animosity and simply do the mundane work of making articles better. Easy. No good will come from this battleground mentality. Want me off your talk page? Cease your tendentious editing, and I will have no reason to communicate directly with you here. ? More of the same. Anybody who simply wanted to make better articles would have just fixed it. Change a couple words and problem solved. Instead you run over to '''start another pointless debate'''. That's why you are seeing thees talk page warnings that bother you so much. Stop the pointless fighting, and you will be left alone. --] (]) 21:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:14, 3 October 2015
Please comment on Talk:Grand Duchy of Lithuania
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Volkswagen emissions violations, you may be blocked from editing.
This is another example of Tendentious editing on this article. Every single edit you have made to this article, and every single talk page comment, has been biased in one direction only: to improve VW's public image and soften, whitewash, or simply delete any negative information about VW. Please try to find neutrality between all points of view rather than only push one POV.
You have been warned many times for tendentious editing. Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- The the stock price fall was discussed on the talk page, you had nothing to say. When the proposed data was put there, you took no interest and found no fault. When I added the graph and table yesterday, no problem from anyone. But today a hot 26 minutes after I reverted your tendenitious edits and warned you about your POV pushing, all of a sudden you're concerned that this stock data is unsourced. These are of course public records where numerious sources etc can easily verify the numbers given. Note that " (also known by the redirects and ) is a template used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source. These stock prices are not "questionable"; they are common knowledge and easily cited. Instead you escalate rather than simply fixing the "problem" of a lack of citation, or better yet, go find something important to help make the article better.
It is obvious that your actions are due to your use of Misplaced Pages as a battleground for the purpose of carrying on grudges rather than building an encyclopedia.
Please find a productive use of your time that makes an article better rather than trying to fight with other editors. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- "Please stop" you ask, in your edit summary? Nope, not stopping, am I? Please stop your disruptive editing and there would be no need of these warnings. Put aside your personal animosity and simply do the mundane work of making articles better. Easy. No good will come from this battleground mentality. Want me off your talk page? Cease your tendentious editing, and I will have no reason to communicate directly with you here. This right here? More of the same. Anybody who simply wanted to make better articles would have just fixed it. Change a couple words and problem solved. Instead you run over to start another pointless debate. That's why you are seeing thees talk page warnings that bother you so much. Stop the pointless fighting, and you will be left alone. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC)