Misplaced Pages

Talk:Deep-throating: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:39, 10 August 2006 editPublicgirluk (talk | contribs)58 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 00:27, 14 August 2006 edit undoRatherBeBiking (talk | contribs)210 edits ehNext edit →
Line 42: Line 42:
STILL NOT A LINK TO 'EXAMPLES'!!!!!! Link to a porn site. Grow up people....oy STILL NOT A LINK TO 'EXAMPLES'!!!!!! Link to a porn site. Grow up people....oy


——————

"Removed 'in pornography' link, which, though it did go to a deepthroat pornography site, it is prudent to remove this link, as the site is degrading and buggy.)"

I just removed the "In pornography link". I would like to further add and note the degrading manner in treatment and attitude towards women of the aforementioned offsite 'examples'.
Stuff like - "bitches sucking it all the way dooowwn" and, this is a direct qoute -
"By the
time we were done with her, she had a nut mustache and was taking cumshots in her eyes!!!".

I hope I'm not overdoing this, but short and sweet, it was a link to a pornography paysite, and I'm sure with the already available description, we don't need that link there. ] 00:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC) (August 13th, 2006) ] 00:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


== COPYRIGHT == == COPYRIGHT ==

Revision as of 00:27, 14 August 2006

Removed quationable statements from the article:

It also helps -- as the erect penis head is swallowed -- to contract different throat and mouth muscle groups to massage for more pleasure.

Cite please?

It may help with the swallowing of semen, but the quantity of semen may, at times, triple in volume.

Cite please?

Any idea what proportion of females can perform this act? CharlotteA 12 May 2006

-- The Anome 01:43, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Removed statement that It is usually helpful to have a willing ... partner — perhaps "legal" would have been a better word than "helpful". Vashti 16:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)


Removing the Pornstars section

It appears to me that this entire section should be removed. This article should be an encyclopedic entry about the act, not a compilation of pornstars who do it. --Krich (talk) 19:32, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Made a List of female porn stars who deepthroat. I made a See also section in this article to point to the list. Ik.pas.aan 13:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Might as well remove the see also section - the article linked to doesn't exist, and doesn't need to in an encyclopedia
Agreed.

Very much disagreed. Conservatism is the enemy of any reasonably objective collection of information REGARDLESS of how offensive it may be to those who are living in the 1920's. Up till this point I hadn't known there were such evident levels of bias here on Misplaced Pages. I will make sure to limit my searches to less risque topics that do not require such an objective or open mind. I will go elsewhere for information pertaining to aspects of human society that those who accept their humanity are willing to acknowledge.

Or you could've gotten an account, logged on, and tried to fix what you thought was wrong. You know, instead of running away with no effort at all? Maybe gspawn 16:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

These site do not demostrate "deepthroat". The second one just shows a porn site! ts

eh

The 'examples' appears to be collection of semi-related porn. Seems like it should be deleted IMO.

I agree, it's not really informational, but more pornographic prose.

Again, this last site does not link to examples! It links to an adulot porn site, and this site changes daily. I'm all for oral action, but this is not the correct "example".

STILL NOT A LINK TO 'EXAMPLES'!!!!!! Link to a porn site. Grow up people....oy

——————

"Removed 'in pornography' link, which, though it did go to a deepthroat pornography site, it is prudent to remove this link, as the site is degrading and buggy.)"

I just removed the "In pornography link". I would like to further add and note the degrading manner in treatment and attitude towards women of the aforementioned offsite 'examples'. Stuff like - "bitches sucking it all the way dooowwn" and, this is a direct qoute - "By the time we were done with her, she had a nut mustache and was taking cumshots in her eyes!!!".

I hope I'm not overdoing this, but short and sweet, it was a link to a pornography paysite, and I'm sure with the already available description, we don't need that link there. RatherBeBiking 00:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC) (August 13th, 2006) RatherBeBiking 00:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

COPYRIGHT

The greater majority of this article is copied word for word from this site : http://www.deepthroatexpert.com/ Such content is copyright protected.

Agreed, 98% of it is just a copy and paste job that needs to be removed.

purportedly?

Cynthia Heimel can claim that the film was done by mirrors. But since the film there is plenty of other video evidence and individual experience to show the act is real and practised. Have removed the word "Purportedly" accordingly. Publicgirluk 06:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)