| Revision as of 04:50, 7 November 2015 editBelovaci (talk | contribs)179 edits →November 2015← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:12, 7 November 2015 edit undoThe Earwig (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators26,539 edits →Autodidactics: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you make ] on other people again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 04:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC) this is a joke right ???? stop stalking and harrasting me | ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you make ] on other people again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 04:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC) this is a joke right ???? stop stalking and harrasting me | ||
| == Autodidactics == | |||
| Hi. Here's the issue: none of the sources you've provided actually say that these people are autodidactic. Calling them such without a source is ], and that's not allowed by policy. It's not our place as encyclopedia editors to define whether or not a person was an autodidactic based on our ''own'' definitions. We need to use sources. | |||
| Also, ] is ''not'' allowed, even if you disagree with someone else. You should be discussing this on the talk pages. This is your final warning. — ] <sup>'']''</sup> 05:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:12, 7 November 2015
Ways to improve Gert Verhulst
Hi, I'm Kudpung. Belovaci, thanks for creating Gert Verhulst!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs careful copyediting into correct Englsh. URLs need condensing and cleaning up (naked). For more informatin se WP:CITE
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Ok thanks alot, is there some way to fasten changing links into citations ? (like on the french wikipedia) otherwise its gona take weeks.
September 2015
Per WP:BLP, please do not put so much emphasis on a few years of high school completed, calling it self-taught or autodidact, when the sources do not support this label. Binksternet (talk) 02:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ok first of all , who are u to tell me that ???? are u a moderator or whatever ??? second i bring 5 sources to the article, infact every article that u find will tell u that he was a dropout !! it might not say autodidact but it is, if u can create a powerful billion dollar corporation worldwide as a dropout u are an autodidact !!! please whats ur problem ???? do ur research
- I'm not an administrator but I'm an experienced editor who knows his way around Misplaced Pages's guidelines. The WP:BLP guideline is pretty firmly against using references that do not say the thing that you are writing down. Binksternet (talk) 02:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Binksternet: as an "experienced editor" you should be aware of of 3RR and Edit Warring; Both of you are in clear violation of 3RR and are edit warring; You are supposed to have moved discussion to the article talk page so that you don't end up on Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring; you two can either work it out or report each other, if edit warring continues I intend to make the report. Falconjh (talk) 02:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- I have been reverting per WP:BLP which allows any number of reverts of controversial information about living persons. Binksternet (talk) 02:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC) controversial information ???? what are u talking about ??? this is pure subjectif
- Having now read BLP; taking it to the talk page and the Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard is still the correct course of action, even if the 3RR may not apply; with that being clarified, you are still edit warring, take it to the talk page, work it out, or report each other to whichever of the noticeboards you feel is appropriate. Falconjh (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- I have been reverting per WP:BLP which allows any number of reverts of controversial information about living persons. Binksternet (talk) 02:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC) controversial information ???? what are u talking about ??? this is pure subjectif
ok thanks i wil do
what am i saying ???? maybe thats why you are not an administrator yet after 160000 edits and by the way guidlines are not rules !
What is the defenition of sombody like this ? he amassed a fortune estimated to top $1 billion. Not bad for a poor kid from Ann Arbor, Michigan, who graduated last in his high school class, was kicked out of seminary school, and enrolled in college six times without getting past the status of freshman.
Yeah right Autodidact !!
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:Binksternet. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
i did not harrast nobody, u are harasting me with this kind of messages so u watch out
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:Mlpearc, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC) this is a joke right ???? stop stalking and harrasting me
Autodidactics
Hi. Here's the issue: none of the sources you've provided actually say that these people are autodidactic. Calling them such without a source is synthesis, and that's not allowed by policy. It's not our place as encyclopedia editors to define whether or not a person was an autodidactic based on our own definitions. We need to use sources.
Also, edit warring is not allowed, even if you disagree with someone else. You should be discussing this on the talk pages. This is your final warning. — Earwig 05:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)