| Revision as of 12:54, 23 November 2015 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,069 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:48, 23 September 2016 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,069 edits →Extended confirmed protection: new sectionTag: MassMessage deliveryNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691987405 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691987405 --> | ||
| == Extended confirmed protection == | |||
| {{ivmbox|1=Hello, InShaneee. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. | |||
| ] (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned ] was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following ] with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. | |||
| In July and August 2016, ] established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions: | |||
| * '''Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective'''. It should not be used as a first resort. | |||
| * '''A bot will post a notification at ] of each use'''. MusikBot currently does this by updating ], which is transcluded onto the noticeboard. | |||
| Please review ] carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. <br><small>This message was sent to the administrators' ]. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |2=Padlock-blue.svg}} | |||
| <!--Message sent following discussion at WT:PP--> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=737471142 --> | |||
Revision as of 17:48, 23 September 2016
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Click here to start a new talk section.
ProPakistani
- Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/ProPakistani (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)
- ProPakistani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I'm not sure, it is a borderline submission, but would you accept the submission now or does it fail under WP:1News? mabdul (public) 12:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Blah...I'm still not seeing anything directly about the site in any of the references. The PKNIC thing is definitely noteworthy, but I'm not sure that it justifies the whole article. I really wish Abuzarsajjad had gotten back to me about possible sources in Urdu, because I do get the feeling this site might be something within Pakistan and nearby, but googling in english just doesn't turn up anything but promotional sites for me. I specifically avoided the AfC because I don't want to look like judge, jury, and executioner here, but if it were me, I'd say this article still falls into the "almost there" pile. InShaneee (talk) 02:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was really unsure about that article and thought something like "AGF, borderline, but AGF", but when moving/accepting the page protection stopped me. I really need to add a warning to the tool checking the deletion log. This would really help even experienced editors!
- Thanks, I will decline it now. mabdul 05:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Sir If you see ProPakistani Rank 65th in Pakistan and 7,020 worldwide. 90.6% visitors are from Pakistan. In technology ProPakistani is first website in mind in Pakistan. Afterwards many International and National Newspapers, TV Channels like BBC, Express Tribune, Telegraph also used their reporting stories. I Know this is not a proper Reason for Article creation. I was not promoting ProPakistani, I have no link with ProPakistani.
- At 3G technology auction ProPakistani also reported entire event there was 1,850 Comments.
- This story is in Urdu It's clear that BBC named Aamir Attaa (ProPakistani Founder) as Pakistan's IT Expert. May be you say all of these points doesn't clarify the value of article but that website is widely appreciated in Pakistan. If you have any doubt Please check there social profiles on Twitter, Facebook
- This is a late reply because I see this today. Muhammad Abuzar Sajjad (talk) 13:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Notification
I just wanted to let you know that I've made reference to past incidents involving yourself from several years back in an ArbCom case statement. It was for purely contextual purposes, and I did not intent to cast you in a negative light. Kurtis 08:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- "...additional history of vindictiveness and inappropriate decisions"; I'd hate to see what casting me in a negative light would actually consist of, then. InShaneee (talk) 10:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Ritz7286/sandbox
Hello InShaneee. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Ritz7286/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, InShaneee. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)