Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Gay rights in Brazil: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:05, 14 August 2006 editDanB DanD (talk | contribs)2,160 edits []: keep← Previous edit Revision as of 02:05, 14 August 2006 edit undoDanB DanD (talk | contribs)2,160 editsm []: forgot to signNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
Delete or at least merge with something, this one-sentence vanity article adds nothing on its own. Complete self-serving trash. ] 01:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Delete or at least merge with something, this one-sentence vanity article adds nothing on its own. Complete self-serving trash. ] 01:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' the article is a pretty poor stub at the moment, but should remain for expansion: there is plenty to be said on the subject, and Wiki has a series of "Gay Rights in " which is intended to be comprehensive. It's certainly not "vanity" as it doesn't promote any non-notable person or organization. It's just skimpy in its present form. * '''Keep''' the article is a pretty poor stub at the moment, but should remain for expansion: there is plenty to be said on the subject, and Wiki has a series of "Gay Rights in " which is intended to be comprehensive. It's certainly not "vanity" as it doesn't promote any non-notable person or organization. It's just skimpy in its present form. ] 02:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:05, 14 August 2006

Gay rights in Brazil

Delete or at least merge with something, this one-sentence vanity article adds nothing on its own. Complete self-serving trash. Courtney Akins 01:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep the article is a pretty poor stub at the moment, but should remain for expansion: there is plenty to be said on the subject, and Wiki has a series of "Gay Rights in " which is intended to be comprehensive. It's certainly not "vanity" as it doesn't promote any non-notable person or organization. It's just skimpy in its present form. DanB DanD 02:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)