| Revision as of 17:18, 10 January 2016 editElvey (talk | contribs)9,497 edits →Threat: request← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:27, 10 January 2016 edit undoElvey (talk | contribs)9,497 edits →Threat: big pictureNext edit → | ||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
| Also, would you be willing to at least tag or give me the go-ahead to tag the talk pages of the IPs, so, e.g. it would be easier to ID if ? | Also, would you be willing to at least tag or give me the go-ahead to tag the talk pages of the IPs, so, e.g. it would be easier to ID if ? | ||
| What's the bigger picture here? It's about a cabal fighting a war to, as you have noted, to defend big pharma by what could be described ''charitably'' as "any means necessary". It took many users and months of edit warring (not by me) to get any info at all about the incredibly lousy PARADIGM-HF trial despite lots of damn reliable media coverage of this very important topic. finally got a little bit to stick. And I think big pharma does lots of good work. But the whitewashing is harmful. | |||
| --]<sup>(]•])</sup> 04:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | --]<sup>(]•])</sup> 04:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 10 January 2016
|
| Archives |
|---|
|
2013: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec |
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
2016
|
|
Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary blisters. |
- Thank you, Cullen328, and all the best to you for 2016. SarahSV 23:11, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Gnu Ear Greetings
  
|
Hopp(y) Gnu Ear |
|
Hoppy Gnu Ear to you! Hoppy Gnu Ear to you! Buster Seven Talk 07:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC) |
- Hoppy Gnu Ear back to you, Buster. :D I really hope 2016 is a good one for you. SarahSV 23:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
2016
Happy New Year! Be well, be safe, and a hug and all my best wishes...Modernist (talk) 23:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Modernist, and all the best to you back (and a hug too!) for 2016. SarahSV 23:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
You might be interested...
In Talk:Antony Bek (bishop of Durham), as I recall you've had some issues with people changing reference styles unilaterally. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, Ealdgyth, I missed this earlier, but it seems to have sorted itself out. SarahSV 04:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Happy 2016
|
New beginnings |
| Hope you have a wonderful and productive year. I know we've disagreed in the past about the best way to present information about the cultural aspects of meat-eating, but at the risk of WP:CGTW#7 I'd like to offer a fresh start. Looking forward to seeing more of your fine work— FourViolas (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC) |
- Many thanks, FourViolas, and a very Happy New Year to you. SarahSV 04:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Gender template
I completely agree with your suggestion about a gender template. I was actually looking for one yesterday and thought we should have one. How about we try starting one up. How about {{genderPOV}}?
Peter 10:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Peter Isotalo, I agree that we should do that. I began one yesterday, but didn't complete, so feel free to start one, or I may do it if you don't. I'll look out for it. SarahSV 21:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Created. No idea what to do next.
- Peter 22:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- That's excellent, thank you! I suppose the thing to do is start adding it when we see these problems, just as people add {{globalize}}. Also, let GGTF and WikiProject Feminism know about it, and perhaps add it to the main GGTF page. SarahSV 22:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Are you going to add some guideline as to when and how it should be used? (I know the "globalize" tag is frequently misused...) Montanabw 09:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Montanabw: yes, we'll get something worked out. I tried to add some words yesterday but wasn't sure how to approach it. Discussion at GGTF. SarahSV 21:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Invitation to a virtual editathon on Women in Music
| Women in Music | |
|---|---|
 |
|
--Ipigott (talk) 14:49, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HitlerRealschule.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HitlerRealschule.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete empty WP:MEDRS talk archives?
Hey, SlimVirgin. Do you mind deleting Misplaced Pages talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/Archive 23 and Misplaced Pages talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/Archive 24 as empty? I emptied them when moving material, and I don't want the bot or OneClickArchiver to skip over them right to archive 25 when it archives the next batch. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Wow, that was fast. Thanks a lot. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:42, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Threat
I've been threatened with a block
by an wp:involved admin if I participate further in the SPI. That seems highly improper - irrespective of the merits. No? Apparently, he's immune to wp:involved violations.
As for the merits, he claims it's because I've insulted folks. I've done no such thing. I've called him out for violating policies and pointed out that he's blown me off, big time. That I have done. And that's what he's done. And I've called out the refusal to ban the IPs back when they were not stale AT ALL. I've tried hard to respect policy. I've done well, I think even though, among other things, I've got Jytdog, who frequently jumped to Formerly 98's defence whenever needed (examples, analysis) following me around. (analysis 2).
Formerly 98 still has 3 unblocked named accounts -User:A_Bertheim, User:Alfred Bertheim, User:Formerly 98 User:A_Bertheim / User:Renamed_user_51g7z61hz5af2azs6k6, but instead of blocking them, Vanjagenije told me 4 days ago to drop the stick! (See link to 2 sections of 's talk page, above.) He doesn't seem to care in the least about following policy himself. Now he's removing my comments - this one for the second time and it was directed to you.
Also, would you be willing to at least tag or give me the go-ahead to tag the talk pages of the IPs, so, e.g. it would be easier to ID if this is the same guy ?
What's the bigger picture here? It's about a cabal fighting a war to, as you have noted, to defend big pharma by what could be described charitably as "any means necessary". It took many users and months of edit warring (not by me) to get any info at all about the incredibly lousy PARADIGM-HF trial despite lots of damn reliable media coverage of this very important topic. This edit of mine finally got a little bit to stick. And I think big pharma does lots of good work. But the whitewashing is harmful.