| Revision as of 01:55, 16 August 2006 editBeanSmoke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users944 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:05, 16 August 2006 edit undo24.192.157.2 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Why can't we have an article on encyclopedia dramatica? It is an actual website , and is a paradoy site similar to ]. --] 01:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC) | Why can't we have an article on encyclopedia dramatica? It is an actual website , and is a paradoy site similar to ]. --] 01:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Encyclopedia Dramatica is as noteworthy as Uncyclopedia or any other humor-based Wiki. Sure, the humor is a bit raunchy and vulgar and may never appeal to a mainstream audience, but it's still funnier than Uncyclopedia. (Which is very unfunny) | |||
| Contrary to popular belief, it's not just about blog drama, and gets a lot of hits. So don't get your panties up in a bunch and say stuff about non-notability. | |||
| Don't see why there shouldn't be an article. | |||
Revision as of 03:05, 16 August 2006
Why can't we have an article on encyclopedia dramatica? It is an actual website , and is a paradoy site similar to Uncyclopedia. --Phantom784 01:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Encyclopedia Dramatica is as noteworthy as Uncyclopedia or any other humor-based Wiki. Sure, the humor is a bit raunchy and vulgar and may never appeal to a mainstream audience, but it's still funnier than Uncyclopedia. (Which is very unfunny)
Contrary to popular belief, it's not just about blog drama, and gets a lot of hits. So don't get your panties up in a bunch and say stuff about non-notability.
Don't see why there shouldn't be an article.