| Revision as of 13:38, 20 January 2016 editNecrothesp (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators189,698 edits →Ashburne Hall← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:31, 24 January 2016 edit undoJohnsoniensis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users720,824 edits keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]] 01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]] 01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep''' per ]. Grade II-listed building and plenty of coverage. The Historic England listing gives very good reasons as to its historic and architectural significance. -- ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per ]. Grade II-listed building and plenty of coverage. The Historic England listing gives very good reasons as to its historic and architectural significance. -- ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' for reasons given by Redrose and Necrothesp.--] (]) 19:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
Revision as of 19:31, 24 January 2016
Ashburne Hall
- Ashburne Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable on its own - All encyclopedia worthy information is included in the Fallowfield Campus article ツStacey (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep WP:GNG says "if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article" - which part of that has not been met? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. Grade II-listed building and plenty of coverage. The Historic England listing gives very good reasons as to its historic and architectural significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons given by Redrose and Necrothesp.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)