| Revision as of 18:32, 24 January 2016 editWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 edits Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. (TW)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 18:36, 24 January 2016 edit undoWorldWideNut (talk | contribs)84 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
| Line 89: |
Line 89: |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
== January 2016 == |
|
|
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|
|
Please be particularly aware that ] states: |
|
|
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. |
|
|
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|
|
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> <code>{{u|]}} {]}</code> 14:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 18:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
|
|
] |
|
|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 18:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
