| Revision as of 05:28, 25 January 2016 editOpabinia regalis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators16,306 edits →User:Brayden96 unblocked: almost done← Previous edit |
Revision as of 04:24, 11 March 2016 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,962 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Ban Appeals Subcommittee/Archives/2016) (botNext edit → |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
|
|
|
|
{{clear}} |
|
{{clear}} |
|
|
|
|
== ] unblocked == |
|
|
|
|
|
Following a successful appeal, ] has been unblocked. ] <small>]</small> 04:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
*I've raised issues with this unblock at GorrillaWarfare's talk page before noticing this; I'm not sure this page is watched at all but I'm fine with discussion taking place wherever best suited; GW can move my talk page messages here is she wishes. <span style="font-size:10pt;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;"><big>☺</big> · ] · ]</span> 07:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
::I have a different concern, that being that BASC doesn't exist anymore, so....yea, what? ] (]) 19:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Bah, my understanding is that appeals opened before the dissolution of the Subcommittee are still seen through a resolution. <span style="font-size:10pt;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;"><big>☺</big> · ] · ]</span> 19:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
::::If that's the case it seems a perfect example of why we got rid of BASC to begin with. Full arbcom cases are usually decided in less time. ] (]) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::FYI, we are ''almost'' at the end of the remaining BASC appeals. ] (]) 05:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
