| Revision as of 15:41, 17 August 2006 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 editsm →Revert warring← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:46, 17 August 2006 edit undoM.K (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers13,165 edits →Revert warringNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :Dear Ghirlandajo, were did you take that I ''obliterate the fact that the first churches in Lithuania and its capital were Orthodox.'' ] 15:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | :Dear Ghirlandajo, were did you take that I ''obliterate the fact that the first churches in Lithuania and its capital were Orthodox.'' ] 15:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Dear M.K., you are keen to obliterate the mention of chronicles that I supplied in favour of citing your favourite nationalist hackwriters. Such an attitude seems very disturbing to me. You attack every article even remotely connected with Lithuanian history (such as ]) to pump it with nationalist insinuations and ]. Please stop. --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 15:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | ::Dear M.K., you are keen to obliterate the mention of chronicles that I supplied in favour of citing your favourite nationalist hackwriters. Such an attitude seems very disturbing to me. You attack every article even remotely connected with Lithuanian history (such as ]) to pump it with nationalist insinuations and ]. Please stop. --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 15:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::I am not attacking, Ghirlandajo, you see the problem is your rv., I was very kindly removed disputed statement as, Orthodox, but you rv. It without a hesitation. Now I only provided some primary sources that your statement is not very accurate. If you like we can go to primary edit of another editor were was no ''Orthodox'' ruler Algirdas''.] 15:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:46, 17 August 2006
Revert warring
I would like to point out that such edits are not acceptable. I don't know why you are so keen to obliterate the fact that the first churches in Lithuania and its capital were Orthodox. It is a fact and you have to live with it. I don't think that rabid revert warring aimed at obliterating the references to chronicles not to your liking will help to promote your POV. Misplaced Pages is not a Lithuanian propaganda machine. If you want to obliterate the memory of Lithuanian Orthodoxy, please consider converting the oldest church of your city into a place where the corpses are cut, as your ancestors did in the 19th century. --Ghirla 15:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dear Ghirlandajo, were did you take that I obliterate the fact that the first churches in Lithuania and its capital were Orthodox. M.K. 15:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dear M.K., you are keen to obliterate the mention of chronicles that I supplied in favour of citing your favourite nationalist hackwriters. Such an attitude seems very disturbing to me. You attack every article even remotely connected with Lithuanian history (such as Navahradak) to pump it with nationalist insinuations and original research. Please stop. --Ghirla 15:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am not attacking, Ghirlandajo, you see the problem is your rv., I was very kindly removed disputed statement as, Orthodox, but you rv. It without a hesitation. Now I only provided some primary sources that your statement is not very accurate. If you like we can go to primary edit of another editor were was no Orthodox ruler Algirdas.M.K. 15:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dear M.K., you are keen to obliterate the mention of chronicles that I supplied in favour of citing your favourite nationalist hackwriters. Such an attitude seems very disturbing to me. You attack every article even remotely connected with Lithuanian history (such as Navahradak) to pump it with nationalist insinuations and original research. Please stop. --Ghirla 15:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)