| Revision as of 07:02, 8 February 2016 editDavid Tornheim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers16,949 edits removed sentence which used blog as its reference -- same done at Genetically modified food controversies← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:11, 8 February 2016 edit undoDavid Tornheim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers16,949 edits remove sentences that are based on self-published/blog articles -- not WP:RS -- blogs are "are largely not acceptable" WP:USERGNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{POV|date=February 2016}} | {{POV|date=February 2016}} | ||
| '''GMO conspiracy theories''' are ] related to the production and sale of ] and ] (referred to as ]s or "GMOs" by activists) that have been identified by various commentators and skeptics including ],<ref name=":0">Shermer, Michael. "Conspiracy Central." Scientific American 311.6 (2014): 94-94.</ref> ] |
'''GMO conspiracy theories''' are ] related to the production and sale of ] and ] (referred to as ]s or "GMOs" by activists) that have been identified by various commentators and skeptics including ],<ref name=":0">Shermer, Michael. "Conspiracy Central." Scientific American 311.6 (2014): 94-94.</ref> and ].<ref name=":1">{{cite web | url=https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/05/11/why-gmos-challenging-anti-technology-conspiracy-theories/ |title=Why GMOs? Challenging anti-technology conspiracy theories|publisher=geneticliteracyproject.org|author=Jon Entine| date=11 May 2015|accessdate=31 January 2016}}</ref> Generally, these conspiracy theories posit that GMOs are being knowingly and maliciously introduced into the food supply either as a means to unduly enrich agribusinesses or as a means to poison or pacify the population. | ||
| Time to call out the anti-GMO conspiracy theory|publisher=marklynas.org|author=Mark Lynas|date= 29 April 2013|accessdate=31 January 2016}}</ref> and ].<ref name=":1">{{cite web | url=https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/05/11/why-gmos-challenging-anti-technology-conspiracy-theories/ |title=Why GMOs? Challenging anti-technology conspiracy theories|publisher=geneticliteracyproject.org|author=Jon Entine| date=11 May 2015|accessdate=31 January 2016}}</ref> Generally, these conspiracy theories posit that GMOs are being knowingly and maliciously introduced into the food supply either as a means to unduly enrich agribusinesses or as a means to poison or pacify the population.<ref name=":0" /><ref name="Lynas" /><ref name=":1" /> | |||
| Conspiracy theories involving GMOs and their promoters have been invoked in a variety of contexts. A work seeking to explore risk perception over GMOs in ] identified a belief among the conservative political and religious figures who were opposed to GMOs that GMOs were "a conspiracy by Jewish Multinational Companies and Israel for world domination."<ref>{{Cite journal|title = Worldviews and discursive construction of GMO-related risk perceptions in Turkey|url = http://pus.sagepub.com/content/22/2/137|journal = Public Understanding of Science|date = 2013-02-01|issn = 0963-6625|pmid = 23833021|pages = 137–154|volume = 22|issue = 2|doi = 10.1177/0963662511423334|language = en|first = Giuseppe A.|last = Veltri|first2 = Ahmet K.|last2 = Suerdem}}</ref> Additionally, a ]n study showed that a segment of the population believed that GMOs were part of a greater conspiracy theory to poison the population of the country.<ref>{{Cite web|title = SHS Web of Conferences|url = http://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/abs/2014/07/shsconf_shw2012_00048/shsconf_shw2012_00048.html|website = www.shs-conferences.org|access-date = 2016-01-31}}</ref> | Conspiracy theories involving GMOs and their promoters have been invoked in a variety of contexts. A work seeking to explore risk perception over GMOs in ] identified a belief among the conservative political and religious figures who were opposed to GMOs that GMOs were "a conspiracy by Jewish Multinational Companies and Israel for world domination."<ref>{{Cite journal|title = Worldviews and discursive construction of GMO-related risk perceptions in Turkey|url = http://pus.sagepub.com/content/22/2/137|journal = Public Understanding of Science|date = 2013-02-01|issn = 0963-6625|pmid = 23833021|pages = 137–154|volume = 22|issue = 2|doi = 10.1177/0963662511423334|language = en|first = Giuseppe A.|last = Veltri|first2 = Ahmet K.|last2 = Suerdem}}</ref> Additionally, a ]n study showed that a segment of the population believed that GMOs were part of a greater conspiracy theory to poison the population of the country.<ref>{{Cite web|title = SHS Web of Conferences|url = http://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/abs/2014/07/shsconf_shw2012_00048/shsconf_shw2012_00048.html|website = www.shs-conferences.org|access-date = 2016-01-31}}</ref> | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
| ==Monsanto== | ==Monsanto== | ||
| A major aspect of many conspiracy theories is the fear that large ]es, especially ] are working to undermine the health and safety of the general public by introducing and promoting GMOs in the food supply. |
A major aspect of many conspiracy theories is the fear that large ]es, especially ] are working to undermine the health and safety of the general public by introducing and promoting GMOs in the food supply. ] was criticized by science blogger Kyle Hill on the '']'' website for promulgating ''Argumentum Ad Monsantum''. According to Hill, "aking the leap from Monsanto’s business practices—whatever you may think of them—to the “dangers” of GM foods is a mistake in logical reasoning. It is akin to saying landscape paintings are potentially evil because the painter was a serial killer."<ref>{{Cite web|title = Argumentum Ad Monsantum: Bill Maher and The Lure of a Liberal Logical Fallacy|url = http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/but-not-simpler/argumentum-ad-monsantum-bill-maher-and-the-lure-of-a-liberal-logical-fallacy/|website = Scientific American Blog Network|access-date = 2016-02-02|first = Kyle|last = Hill}}</ref> Some anti-GMO activists claimed that Monsanto infiltrated both the American ] and the ] which is why the two organizations have supported the scientific evidence for the safety of the genetically engineered food available for human consumption.<ref>{{Cite web|title = The Misleading War on GMOs: The Food Is Safe. The Rhetoric Is Dangerous.|url = http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/07/are_gmos_safe_yes_the_case_against_them_is_full_of_fraud_lies_and_errors.html|website = Slate Magazine|access-date = 2016-02-02}}</ref> | ||
| Belief that Monsanto is particularly problematic has inspired such actions as the ] and the singling out of Monsanto over other agribusinesses such as ], ], ], ] and ], and has been identified as a salient feature of anti-GMO activism.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/061913/why-monsanto-evil-dupont-isnt.asp | title=Why Is Monsanto Evil, But DuPont Isn't?|publisher=] |author=Stephen D. Simpson, CFA|accessdate=31 January 2016}}</ref> | Belief that Monsanto is particularly problematic has inspired such actions as the ] and the singling out of Monsanto over other agribusinesses such as ], ], ], ] and ], and has been identified as a salient feature of anti-GMO activism.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/061913/why-monsanto-evil-dupont-isnt.asp | title=Why Is Monsanto Evil, But DuPont Isn't?|publisher=] |author=Stephen D. Simpson, CFA|accessdate=31 January 2016}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 07:11, 8 February 2016
 | The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (February 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
GMO conspiracy theories are conspiracy theories related to the production and sale of genetically modified crops and genetically modified food (referred to as genetically modified organisms or "GMOs" by activists) that have been identified by various commentators and skeptics including Michael Shermer, and Jon Entine. Generally, these conspiracy theories posit that GMOs are being knowingly and maliciously introduced into the food supply either as a means to unduly enrich agribusinesses or as a means to poison or pacify the population.
Conspiracy theories involving GMOs and their promoters have been invoked in a variety of contexts. A work seeking to explore risk perception over GMOs in Turkey identified a belief among the conservative political and religious figures who were opposed to GMOs that GMOs were "a conspiracy by Jewish Multinational Companies and Israel for world domination." Additionally, a Latvian study showed that a segment of the population believed that GMOs were part of a greater conspiracy theory to poison the population of the country.
Monsanto
A major aspect of many conspiracy theories is the fear that large agribusinesses, especially Monsanto are working to undermine the health and safety of the general public by introducing and promoting GMOs in the food supply. Bill Maher was criticized by science blogger Kyle Hill on the Scientific American website for promulgating Argumentum Ad Monsantum. According to Hill, "aking the leap from Monsanto’s business practices—whatever you may think of them—to the “dangers” of GM foods is a mistake in logical reasoning. It is akin to saying landscape paintings are potentially evil because the painter was a serial killer." Some anti-GMO activists claimed that Monsanto infiltrated both the American Food and Drug Administration and the American Association for the Advancement of Science which is why the two organizations have supported the scientific evidence for the safety of the genetically engineered food available for human consumption.
Belief that Monsanto is particularly problematic has inspired such actions as the March Against Monsanto and the singling out of Monsanto over other agribusinesses such as DuPont, Syngenta, Dow, BASF and Bayer, and has been identified as a salient feature of anti-GMO activism.
An example of Monsanto-based conspiracy theorizing were the claims by some anti-GMO activists that Monsanto banned GMOs from their cafeterias while promoting them for sale and consumption by the public.
Zika virus
In January 2016, concerns over a Zika virus outbreak were accompanied by claims first published on Reddit that the virus was being spread by a genetically modified mosquito. The fears were based in part because of a new mosquito abatement initiative led by Oxitec to control mosquito populations and thereby the spread of tropical diseases such as Zika. The claims was identified as "unproven" by the debunking website snopes.com.
Ethical criticism
In Scholars & Rogues, an online progressive political journal, David Lambert, a development program officer for the United Nations, compared the conspiracy theories supported by some in the anti-GMO movement to those supported in the anti-vaccination movement, "Like preventable childhood diseases, malnutrition is another great moral failing of our time. GMOs such as Golden Rice—rice modified to contain high levels of beta carotene in order to compensate for the vitamin A deficiency which kills hundreds of thousands of children around the world and blinds many more every year—and drought resistant crops, which will become increasingly vital in the global south due to climate change, have vast potential to help those who don’t shop at Whole Foods. But real progress has been stymied by the paranoid and misinformed, who clamor that GMOs, which are biologically no different than “natural” foods, are somehow poisonous. Behind it all is of course an evil corporation: Monsanto."
References
- Shermer, Michael. "Conspiracy Central." Scientific American 311.6 (2014): 94-94.
- Jon Entine (11 May 2015). "Why GMOs? Challenging anti-technology conspiracy theories". geneticliteracyproject.org. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
- Veltri, Giuseppe A.; Suerdem, Ahmet K. (2013-02-01). "Worldviews and discursive construction of GMO-related risk perceptions in Turkey". Public Understanding of Science. 22 (2): 137–154. doi:10.1177/0963662511423334. ISSN 0963-6625. PMID 23833021.
- "SHS Web of Conferences". www.shs-conferences.org. Retrieved 2016-01-31.
- Hill, Kyle. "Argumentum Ad Monsantum: Bill Maher and The Lure of a Liberal Logical Fallacy". Scientific American Blog Network. Retrieved 2016-02-02.
- "The Misleading War on GMOs: The Food Is Safe. The Rhetoric Is Dangerous". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 2016-02-02.
- Stephen D. Simpson, CFA. "Why Is Monsanto Evil, But DuPont Isn't?". Investopedia. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
- Willy Blackmore. "Why We Shouldn't Waste Time on GMO Conspiracies". TakePart. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
- Lydia Ramsey. "A wacky conspiracy is circulating about Zika and GMOs — and it needs to stop". Business Insider. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
- LaCapria, Kim. "MOSTLY FALSE: Zika Virus Caused by GMO Mosquitos". snopes. Retrieved 2016-01-31.
- "Conspiracies against progress: why the rise of the modern conspiracy theory should concern us all". Progressive Culture | Scholars & Rogues. Retrieved 2016-02-02.