| Revision as of 15:26, 15 February 2016 editWikiWikiWayne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,087 edits →February 2016 – Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (topic=ab) – abortion: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:28, 15 February 2016 edit undoWikiWikiWayne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,087 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Planned Parenthood. (TW)-WP:5PNext edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | ||
| == February 2016 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''] is a ] (one-revert rule) page. You are at the limit.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <code>{{u|]}} {]}</code> 15:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:28, 15 February 2016
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hamid Dabashi
Reza Aslan
Hi Roscelese, The video I linked to, despite it's blunt title, seems to be very honest and well researched, giving very important information on Dr. Aslan. Please let me know why you don't think it is a valuable addition to the article.--Ortho (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
RedRabbitIdeas
Hi Roscelese, Thank you for taking the item to provide notes on my article Rabbit Message and my user name. I'm more than happy to make any changes you feel will improve them. I did want to note that the article is written in the same method as a few of the other related articles, so while I am confused by the deletion request, but I will gladly follow any advice on that. As for my user name, it's a user name I have used elsewhere and doesn't reflect my business name or Url, but I have already submitted a name change based on your advice.
Thank you and I hope I can meet the standards set for articles, which is my goal. I am new to this... so I'm still learning.
Thank you for patience and help regarding these concerns :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedRabbitIdeas (talk • contribs) 05:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I'll pick this one up. Might've ignored it, but the "doesn't reflect my business name" bit is almost insulting. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016 – Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (topic=ab) – abortion
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.February 2016
Your recent editing history at Planned Parenthood shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Planned Parenthood is a 1RR (one-revert rule) page. You are at the limit. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 15:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)