Misplaced Pages

Mercury Mountaineer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:55, 21 August 2006 editEjfetters (talk | contribs)Rollbackers11,059 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 03:24, 15 September 2006 edit undo67.59.10.54 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Automobile {{Infobox Automobile
|image=]
|image=
|name=Mercury Mountaineer |name=Mercury Mountaineer
|manufacturer=] |manufacturer=]
Line 7: Line 7:
|production=]-present |production=]-present
|similar=]<br>]<br>]<br>] |similar=]<br>]<br>]<br>]
|related=]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]
}} }}
{{Infobox Automobile generation {{Infobox Automobile generation
|name=First generation |name=First generation
|image=]
|production=]-] |production=]-]
|engine=4.0&nbsp;L '']'' ]<br>5.0&nbsp;L ] |engine=4.0&nbsp;L '']'' ]<br>5.0&nbsp;L ]
|aka=]
|transmission=4-Speed Automatic Overdrive<br>5-Speed Automatic Overdrive |transmission=4-Speed Automatic Overdrive<br>5-Speed Automatic Overdrive
|wheelbase=111.60 in. |wheelbase=111.60 in.
Line 19: Line 18:
|length=190.10 in. |length=190.10 in.
|height=70.50 in. |height=70.50 in.
|related=]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]
}} }}
{{Infobox Automobile generation {{Infobox Automobile generation
Line 26: Line 24:
|production=]-] |production=]-]
|engine=4.0&nbsp;L '']'' ]<br>4.6&nbsp;L '']'' ] |engine=4.0&nbsp;L '']'' ]<br>4.6&nbsp;L '']'' ]
|aka=]<br>]
|related=]
|transmission=5-Speed Automatic Overdrive |transmission=5-Speed Automatic Overdrive
|wheelbase=113.70 in. |wheelbase=113.70 in.
Line 40: Line 36:
|engine=4.0&nbsp;L '']'' ]<br>4.6&nbsp;L '']'' ] ] |engine=4.0&nbsp;L '']'' ]<br>4.6&nbsp;L '']'' ] ]
|transmission=6-speed '']'' ] |transmission=6-speed '']'' ]
|aka=]<br>]
|related=]<br>]
|wheelbase=113.70 in. |wheelbase=113.70 in.
|width=73.50 in. |width=73.50 in.

Revision as of 03:24, 15 September 2006

Motor vehicle
Mercury Mountaineer
Mercury Mountaineer
Overview
ManufacturerFord Motor Company
Production1997-present
Body and chassis
ClassMid-size SUV
Body style4-door SUV
RelatedFord Explorer
Ford Ranger
Land Rover LR3
Lincoln Aviator
Mazda B-Series
Mazda Navajo
Motor vehicle
First generation
Overview
Production1997-2001
Powertrain
Engine4.0 L Cologne V6
5.0 L V8
Transmission4-Speed Automatic Overdrive
5-Speed Automatic Overdrive
Dimensions
Wheelbase111.60 in.
Length190.10 in.
Width70.20 in.
Height70.50 in.
Motor vehicle
Second generation
2004 Mercury Mountaineer
Overview
Production2002-2005
Powertrain
Engine4.0 L Cologne V6
4.6 L Modular V8
Transmission5-Speed Automatic Overdrive
Dimensions
Wheelbase113.70 in.
Length190.70 in.
Width72.10 in.
Height69.60 in.
Motor vehicle
Third generation
2006 Mercury Mountaineer
Overview
Production2006–present
Powertrain
Engine4.0 L Cologne V6
4.6 L Modular 24-valve V8
Transmission6-speed 6R automatic
Dimensions
Wheelbase113.70 in.
Length193.50 in.
Width73.50 in.
Height72.80 in.

The Mercury Mountaineer is a luxury SUV manufauctured by the Mercury brand name, owned by the Ford Motor Company. The Mountaineer shares many features with the Ford Explorer, and in terms of hardware, the vehicles are virtually identical. Externally, they are styled somewhat differently, and the Mountainer is positioned with a more upscale interior, with the Mountaineer's MSRP coming in at $1,000–6,000 more than the Explorer. It has been mildly redesigned for the 2006 model year due to a new frame, but looks very similar to its previous model.

First generation (1997-2001)

Although the redesigned Explorer had already been out for 2 years, Mercury introduced a Explorer twin called the Mountaineer. The Mountaineer was only slightly different from the Explorer, although it did offer a few extra luxury features that the Explorer lacked. First year sales for the Mountaineer were not exactly up to par with the Explorer. For 1998, so customers could differentiate the Mountaineer from the Explorer, as the front fascia was flipped upside down, and the headlights were made smaller, while it got a new rear hatch and unique wheels. Mountaineer sales sped up because of this, though they still lagged behind the Explorer. In 2000, a huge punch came to the Mountaineer with the Firestone vs Ford Motor Company controversy, where a large amount of rollovers were happening involving Explorers and Mountaineers. While Ford blamed Firetone's faunty tires, which had problems with the tread separating, Firestone blamed Ford, claiming that the Explorer and Mountaineer were unsafe. The case was settled, and Car and Driver proved that a large amounts of the rollovers were caused by the drivers overracting to the tire blow out.

Second generation (2002-2005)

For 2002, Ford redesigned the Explorer and Mountaineer. This Mountaineer was new from the ground up, offering even more luxury features than the last generation. This Mountaineer offered features like woodgrain trim, rear radio deck, and a rear seat TV/DVD player. Sales sped up drastically with the introduction of this generation, and it was a look ahead at the entire revamp of the Mercury line, to offer more luxurous looks and features. Some design cues found on this Mountaineer, like the waterfall grille and HID taillights, would go on to form Mercury's new signature look that would appear on all its models. This Mountaineer was also the first to not be based on the Ford Ranger.

Third generation (2006-present)

For 2006, the Mountaineer was redesigned. This new Mountaineer was all new, though it closely resembles the previous model. The Mountaineer was mounted on a new frame, and it offered a more upscale interior, to make up for the cut Lincoln Aviator. This Mountaineer got new wheels and HID headlights, a feature not found on previous Mountaineers.

Firestone Tire Controversy

Main article: Firestone vs Ford Motor Company controversy

In May 2000, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) contacted Ford and Firestone about the high incidence of tire failure on Mercury Mountaineers, Ford Explorers, and Mazda Navajos fitted with Firestone tires. Ford investigated and found that several models of 15 in (381 mm) Firestone tires (ATX, ATX II, and Wilderness AT) had very high failure rates, especially those made at Firestone's Decatur, Illinois plant.

The failures all involved tread separation—the tread peeling off followed often by tire disintegration. If that happened, and the vehicle was running at speed, there was a high likelihood of the vehicle leaving the road and rolling over. Many rollovers cause serious injury and even death; it has been estimated that over 250 deaths and more than 3,000 serious injuries resulted from these failures.

Ford and Firestone have both blamed the other for the failures, which has led to the severing of relations between the two companies. Firestone has claimed that they have found no faults in design nor manufacture, and that failures have been caused by Ford's recommended tire pressure being too low and the vehicle's design. Ford, meanwhile, pointed out that tires manufactured by the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company to the same specification had a spotless safety record when installed on the SUVs. Ford's conclusions were confirmed by NHTSA in their report into the tire failures, published in October 2001.

Many outside observers tend towards blaming both parties; Firestone's tires being prone to tread separation and failure, and the vehicles being especially prone to rolling over if a tire fails at speed compared to other vehicles. However, a subsequent NHTSA investigation of real world accident data showed that the SUVs were no more likely to roll over than any other SUV.

A product recall was announced, allowing the Explorer, Mountaineer, and Navajo owners to change the affected tires for others.

A large number of lawsuits have been filed against both Ford and Firestone, some unsuccessful, some settled out of court, and a few successfully. Lawyers for the plaintiffs have argued that both Ford and Firestone knew of the dangers but did nothing, and that specifically Ford knew that the Explorer was highly prone to rollovers. Ford denied these allegations.

Car and Driver magazine tested a first-generation Explorer with a built-in rollcage and a special device that would flatten the tire at the push of a button. The Explorer did not flip in any of the numerous tests , and that was mostly because the driver managed to stay calm. Everyday Explorer drivers taken by surprise by a tread separation or loss of tire pressure in high speed traffic situations may have panicked and swerved violently, resulting in a significant portion of reported rollovers.

Canadian market

The Mountaineer was never sold in the Canadian market. The Mountaineer's twin, the Ford Explorer, remains to be sold for the Canadian market. Its other twin, the Lincoln Aviator, was also sold for the Canadian market until its demise in 2005.

References

  1. Edmunds, 2006 Mountaineer review
  2. Forbes, 2000 Mountaineer review

External links


Mercury vehicles
A division of Ford Motor Company, 1939–2011
Historic
models
(by date of
introduction)
1930s
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
Concept cars
Categories: