Revision as of 19:49, 30 March 2016 editSmartse (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators49,357 editsm fix← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:32, 30 March 2016 edit undoPeter Damian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,893 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Comment''' I am interested in this after the investigation mentioned - basically articles where the references were not supported by the sources. ] (]) 19:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' I am interested in this after the investigation mentioned - basically articles where the references were not supported by the sources. ] (]) 19:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
**Can we just keep this discussion focussed on notability? ] (]) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | **Can we just keep this discussion focussed on notability? ] (]) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
**I have no idea about notability, given that half the links did not work, and the links which did work were just passing references. ] (]) 20:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:32, 30 March 2016
Chukwuemeka Fred Agbata
- Chukwuemeka Fred Agbata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have reviewed the sources cited and only this interview (which I can't access) provides in-depth coverage of the subject. I've also looked for other sources but have been unable to find anything better. Unless I've missed something, the multiple in-depth sources requirement of WP:BIO is not met. SmartSE (talk) 17:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- I found an archived version of that source here and it strengthens my opinion about the lack of notability as the interview is completely self-serving and indicates that the source is not RS (i.e. no fact checking). SmartSE (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I am interested in this after the investigation mentioned here - basically articles where the references were not supported by the sources. Peter Damian (talk) 19:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Can we just keep this discussion focussed on notability? SmartSE (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea about notability, given that half the links did not work, and the links which did work were just passing references. Peter Damian (talk) 20:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)