| Revision as of 03:04, 8 April 2016 editIan.thomson (talk | contribs)58,562 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:05, 8 April 2016 edit undoIan.thomson (talk | contribs)58,562 edits →Sources that help establish notability and should be incorporated for neutralityNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| |ref=harv }} | |ref=harv }} | ||
| Two of these I found accidentally while trying to find , so I'm curious as to why they haven't appeared yet. ] (]) 03: |
Two of these I found accidentally while trying to find , so I'm curious as to why they haven't appeared yet. {{ping|RalphWinwood}} how did you not find these? Or if you did, why did you not incorporate them? ] (]) 03:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:05, 8 April 2016
Sources that help establish notability and should be incorporated for neutrality
- Hope, Warren; Holston, Kim (2009). The Shakespeare Controversy: An Analysis of the Authorship Theories (2nd. ed.). McFarland. pp. 128-129.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)
- Edmondson, Paul; Wells, Stanley (2013). Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy. Cambridge UP. pp. 54-60.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)
- Carnegie, David; Taylor, Gary (2012). The Quest for Cardenio: Shakespeare, Fletcher, Cervantes, and the Lost Play. Oxford UP. pp. 67-69.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)
Two of these I found accidentally while trying to find anything else by the publisher of The Truth Will Out, so I'm curious as to why they haven't appeared yet. @RalphWinwood: how did you not find these? Or if you did, why did you not incorporate them? Ian.thomson (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)