| Revision as of 21:37, 23 August 2006 edit66.38.180.253 (talk) →Ditto for you too=← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:45, 23 August 2006 edit undoBhaiSaab (talk | contribs)6,082 edits →Ditto for you too=Next edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| :::Whether it's true or not is irrelevant - you were blocked with the reasoning provided by an admin and the notice can be taken down when and if you are unblocked. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | :::Whether it's true or not is irrelevant - you were blocked with the reasoning provided by an admin and the notice can be taken down when and if you are unblocked. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::::The allegation is totally false and a simple checkuser request can prove that, which you chose not to do. I couldn't care less about being beeing blocked nothwithstanding the fact that the block is completely unfair and shows the total stupidity and arrogance of some admins. However, clearly you have no business to "vandalize" any user's talk page. And if you think you can do that, I reserve the right to do that too. ] 21:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ::::The allegation is totally false and a simple checkuser request can prove that, which you chose not to do. I couldn't care less about being beeing blocked nothwithstanding the fact that the block is completely unfair and shows the total stupidity and arrogance of some admins. However, clearly you have no business to "vandalize" any user's talk page. And if you think you can do that, I reserve the right to do that too. ] 21:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::::It's not up to me to perform a checkuser. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:45, 23 August 2006
|
| 1 2 3 |
Acting uncivil in Talk:Council on American-Islamic Relations#Discuss splitting off of criticism
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! Netaji 06:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Point out which comment you found to be uncivil. BhaiSaab 15:51, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- "petty excuses to hold a double standard" was not a personal attack. BhaiSaab 15:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes it was, Janaab.Netaji 00:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Revert war
- I will revert your changes to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh tomorrow unless you provide a non-biased reference. HRW has been exposed as anti-Semitic. You might like that, but the civilised world reviles anti-Semitism and all the ensuing bias that comes from it.Netaji 00:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Suggesting that you are anti-Semitic is not a personal attack. You have explicitly stated that you hate Israel. That is an anti-Semitic statement.Netaji 00:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- The anti-Defamation league has produced detailed surveys that point out that most critics of Israel are merely using the superficial distinction of Israel vs Jews as a veil to hide their anti-Semitic hatred. If you criticize Israel, there is a statistical probability of significant value that you have anti-Semitic views, even though you are unaware of it at the conscious level. I suggest that you interact with Jewish groups and educate yourself about anti-Semitism and the evil that it has spawned in the muslim world today. This is for your own good.Netaji 00:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Not arbitrary at all. produced by esteemed scholars.Netaji 00:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Curious
Hi, Bahi Saab. What happened to Timothy Usher and Pecher. Why they have resigned? I am curious. Can you please give some information? Thanks --- Faisal 00:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I got my answer while reading His Excellency arbitration page. --- Faisal 01:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
islam by country
some people are trying to erase the pic i had uploded first they reverted it now i have recieved this message
"Hi. This image you uploaded (Image:Muslims population.gif) says that it is copyright with all rights reserved. The link which is supposed to point to the permission to reproduce the image does not appear to mention anything which gives permission. Could you please identify where it says that the image can reproduced for any purpose, otherwise (especially given the copyright text on the image, and the notices above on this page) I think it may be fair to assume that no permission has been given. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)"
please help!Madman 0014 12:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)User:Madman_0014
Islamic Barnstar Award
Please offer your opinion, vote, or whatever about your choice for the image to be used with the Islamic Barnstar Award at the Barnstar proposals page. Although there is consensus for the concept of an Islamic Barnstar Award, some editors would like to change the image for the award. I was just thinking you should be aware of this discussion because you have contributed to Islamic-related articles, received the Islamic Barnstar Award, or have contributed to the Islam-related Wikiprojects, etc.--JuanMuslim 02:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Citecop
I was unaware of the block though I heard netaji was blocked for some time.Bakaman Bakatalk 03:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Bakasuprman
i think he is a sockpuppet of Subash_Bose... I have provided evidence here... evidence --Geek1975 09:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Check User
Hello there. Sorry, but only people with checkuser access are allowed to see a contributors IP address, and they are listed here. Thanks, 17:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Ditto for you too=
Stop vandalizing other users' pages. 66.38.180.253 21:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please provide an example. BhaiSaab 21:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- here: 66.38.180.253 21:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Whether it's true or not is irrelevant - you were blocked with the reasoning provided by an admin and the notice can be taken down when and if you are unblocked. BhaiSaab 21:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- The allegation is totally false and a simple checkuser request can prove that, which you chose not to do. I couldn't care less about being beeing blocked nothwithstanding the fact that the block is completely unfair and shows the total stupidity and arrogance of some admins. However, clearly you have no business to "vandalize" any user's talk page. And if you think you can do that, I reserve the right to do that too. 66.38.180.253 21:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's not up to me to perform a checkuser. BhaiSaab 21:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- The allegation is totally false and a simple checkuser request can prove that, which you chose not to do. I couldn't care less about being beeing blocked nothwithstanding the fact that the block is completely unfair and shows the total stupidity and arrogance of some admins. However, clearly you have no business to "vandalize" any user's talk page. And if you think you can do that, I reserve the right to do that too. 66.38.180.253 21:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Whether it's true or not is irrelevant - you were blocked with the reasoning provided by an admin and the notice can be taken down when and if you are unblocked. BhaiSaab 21:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- here: 66.38.180.253 21:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)