Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:10, 24 August 2006

Style

This article sounds like something from a parent's manual on attachment problems, not an encyclopedia article. I've listed it for cleanup. Quinnanya 16:32, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I've cleaned it up a bit, but there's still a part left - marked with ////////. IMO it should be removed, together with the more practical advise that is given in the text, but I leave that for more experienced Wikipedians. --141.35.111.108 08:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I've completed your work and edited the material so it is more fitting. I'd leave what you had marked as a good example of what the article is talking about. JohnsonRon 17:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

SUBTLE AND NOT SO SUBTLE SIGNS OF ATTACHMENT PROBLEMS

Attachment is fundamental to healthy development, normal personality, and the capacity to form healthy and authentic emotional relationships. How can you determine whether your child has attachment issues that require attention? What is normal behavior, and what are the signs of attachment issues? If you’ve adopted an infant, will you see attachment problems develop? These and other related questions are often at the forefront of adoptive parents’ minds. In this article I will help you understand what to look for and how to identify concerns.

Let’s begin with an explanation of attachment. Attachment is the base of emotional health, social relationships, and one's worldview. The ability to trust and form reciprocal relationships affected the emotional health, security, and safety of the child, as well as the child’s development and future inter-personal relationships. The ability to regulate emotions, have a conscience, and experience empathy all require secure attachment. Healthy brain development is built on a secure attachment relationship.

Children who are adopted after the age of six months are at risk for attachment problems. Normal attachment develops during the child's first two to three years of life. Problems with the mother-child relationship during that time, orphanage experience, or breaks in the consistent caregiver-child relationship interfere with the normal development of a healthy and secure attachment. There are wide ranges of attachment difficulties that result in varying degrees of emotional disturbance in the child. One thing is certain; if an infant's needs are not met consistently, in a loving, nurturing way, attachment will not occur normally and this underlying problem will manifest itself in a variety of symptoms.

When the first-year-of-life attachment-cycle is undermined and the child’s needs are not met, and normal socializing shame is not resolved, mistrust begins to define the perspective of the child and attachment problems result. The cycle can become undermined or broken for many reasons:

· Multiple disruptions in care giving · Post-partum depression causing an emotionally unavailable mother · Hospitalization of the child causing separation from the parent and/or unrelieved pain. For example, stays in a NICU or repeated hospitalizations during infancy. · Parents who are attachment disordered, leading to neglect, abuse (physical/sexual/verbal), or inappropriate parental responses not leading to a secure/predictable relationship · Genetic factors. · Pervasive developmental disorders · Caregivers whose own needs are not met, leading to overload and lack of awareness of the infants needs

The child may develop mistrust, impeding effective attachment behavior. The developmental stages following these first three years continue to be distorted and/or retarded, and common symptoms emerge. Although I am listing several common symptoms it is very important to realize that when you are trying to parent a child with attachment difficulties you must focus on the cause of the behaviors and not on the symptoms or surface behaviors. It is the cause or motivation for the behaviors that must be your focus…otherwise you are like a doctor who treats a cough without figuring out whether the cough is caused by TB, an allergy, the flu, or lung cancer.

· Superficially engaging and charming behavior, phoniness · Avoidance of eye contact. · Indiscriminate affection with strangers. · Lack of affection on parental terms. · Destructiveness to self, others, and material things. · Cruelty to animals. · Crazy lying (lying in the face of the obvious) · Poor impulse control. · Learning lags. · Lack of cause/effect thinking. · Lack of conscience. · Abnormal eating patterns. · Poor peer relationships. · Preoccupation with fire and/or gore. · Persistent nonsense questions and chatter indicating a need to control. · Inappropriate clinginess and demandingness. · Abnormal speech patterns. · Inappropriate sexuality.

What are the underlying causes of these various symptoms? The cause is some break in the early attachment relationship that results in difficulties trusting others. The child experiences a fear of close authentic emotional relationships because early maltreatment or other difficulties has “taught” the child that adults are not trust worthy and that the child is unloved and unlovable. Fundamentally, the cause is a developmental delay. The child may be chronologically six, ten, or fifteen, but developmentally these children are much younger. It is often useful to consider, “at what age would this behavior be normal?” Frequently you will find that the child’s behavior would be normal for a toddler.

Chronic Maltreatment (abuse or neglect) or other disruptions to the normal attachment relationship cause: 1. Fear of intimacy 2. Overwhelming feelings of shame. (Not guilt…shame causes you to want to hide and not be seen. So, for example, some children’s chronic lying can be seen as a manifestation of this pervasive sense of shame. After all, what is a lie, but another way to hide?). 3. Chronic feelings of being unloved 4. Chronic feelings of being unlovable 5. A distorted view of self, other, and relationships based on past maltreatment. 6. Lack of trust 7. Feeling that nothing the child does can make a difference; hence, low motivation and poor academic performance. 8. A core sense of being Bad. 9. Difficulty asking for help 10. Difficulty relying on others in a cooperative and collaborative manner.

So how does one distinguish the difference between a child who "looks" attached and a child who really is making a healthy, secure attachment? This question becomes important for adoptive families because some adopted children will form an almost immediate dependency bond to their adoptive parents. To mistake this as secure and healthy attachment can lead to many problems down the road. Just because a child calls someone Mom or "Dad," snuggles, cuddles, and says, I love you," does not mean that the child is attached or even attaching. Saying, "I love you", and knowing what that really feels like, can be two different things. Attachment is a process. It takes time. The key to its formation is trust, and trust becomes secure only after repeated testing. Generally attachment develops during the first two to three years of life. The child learns that he or she is loved and can love in return. The parents give love and learn that the child loves them. The child learns to trust that his needs will be met in a consistent and nurturing manner. The child learns that he "belongs" to his family and they to him. It is through these elements that a child learns how to love, and how to accept love.

Older adopted children need time to make adjustments to their new surroundings. They need to become familiar with their caregivers, friends, relatives, neighbors, teachers, and others with whom they will have repeated contact. They need to learn the ins and outs of new household routines and adapt to living in a new physical environment. Some children have cultural or language hurdles to overcome. Until most of these tasks have been accomplished, they may not be able to relax enough to allow the work of attachment to begin. In the meantime, behavioral problems related to insecurity and lack of attachment, as well as to other events in the child's past, may start to surface. Some start to get labels, like "manipulative," "superficial," or "sneaky". On the inside, this child is filled with anxiety, fear, grief, loss, and often a profound sense of being bad, defective, and unlovable. The child has not developed the self-esteem that comes with feeling like a valued, contributing, member of a family. The child cares little about pleasing others since his relationships with them are quite superficial.

When are problems first apparent? Children who have experienced physical or sexual abuse, physical or psychological neglect, or orphanage life will begin to show difficulties as young as six-months of age. For example, the signs of difficulties for an infant include the following:

Ø Weak crying response or rageful and/or constant whining; inability to be comforted Ø Tactile defensiveness Ø Poor clinging and extreme resistance to cuddling: seems stiff as a board Ø Poor sucking response Ø Poor eye contact, lack of tracking Ø No reciprocal smile response Ø Indifference to others Ø Failure to respond with recognition to parents. Ø Delayed physical motor skill development milestones (creeping, crawling, sitting, etc.,) Ø Flaccid

WHAT ARE THE SUBTLE SIGNS OF ATTACHMENT PROBLEMS? Gail tells her seven-year-old daughter, Sally, to pick up the napkin Sally has dropped. As Sally crosses her arms a sad and angry pout darkens her face. Gail says, “Sally, I told you to pick up the napkin and throw it away.” Sally stomps over to the napkin, picks it up, and throws it away. Crying and whining, Sally stands with her back to Gail. Sally, angry and unhappy, is exhibiting one of the subtle signs of attachment sensitivity that nearly all children adopted after six-months demonstrate. Attachment is an interpersonal, interactive process that results in a child feeling safe, secure, and able to develop healthy, emotionally meaningful relationships. The process requires a sensitive, responsive parent who is capable of emotional engagement and participation in contingent collaborative communication (responsive communication) at nonverbal and verbal levels. The parent’s ability to respond to the child’s emotional state is what will prevent attachment sensitivities from becoming problems of a more severe nature.

What are the subtle signs of attachment issues? 1. Sensitivity to rejection and to disruptions in the normally attuned connection between mother and child. 2. Avoiding comfort when the child’s feelings are hurt, although the child will turn to the parent for comfort when physically hurt. 3. Difficulty discussing angry feelings or hurt feelings. 4. Over valuing looks, appearances, and clothes. 5. Sleep disturbances. Not wanting to sleep alone. 6. Precocious independence. A level of independence that is more frequently seen in slightly older children. 7. Reticence and anxiety about changes. 8. Picking a scabs and sores. 9. Secretiveness 10. Difficulty tolerating correction or criticism.

Internationally adopted children experience at least two significant changes during the first few months of life that can have a profound impact on later development and security. Birth mother to orphanage or foster care and then orphanage to adoptive home are two transitions. We know from extensive research that prenatal, post-natal, and subsequent experiences create lasting impressions on a child. During the first few minutes, days, and weeks of life, the infant clearly recognizes the birth mother’s voice, smell, and taste. Changes in caregivers are disruptive. The new caregivers look different, smell different, sound different, taste different. In the orphanage there are often many care givers but no one special caregiver. Adoption brings with it a whole new, strange, and initially frightening world. These moves and disruptions have profound effects on a child’s emotional, interpersonal, cognitive, and behavioral development. The longer a child is in alternate care, the more these subtle signs become pervasive.

There are effective ways for a parent to help his or her child. Parents and the right parenting are vital to preventing subtle signs from becoming anything more than sensitivities. Parenting consistently with clear and firm limits is essential. Discipline should be enforced with an attitude of sensitive and responsive empathy, acceptance, curiosity, love, and playfulness. This provides the most healing and protective way to correct a child.

As Sally walks away to pout, Gail comes up behind her, scoops her up, and begins rocking her gently while crooning in Sally’s ear. Gail sings songs and tells Sally she loves her and understands Sally is angry at being told what to do. Gail expresses sadness that Sally is so unhappy. At first Sally resists a bit, but she soon calms down and listens as Gail tells her how much she loves Sally. Sally is sensitive to feelings of rejection and abandonment that are evoked by her mother’s displeasure, so Gail brings Sally closer to reassure Sally nonverbally. It is by experience that the subtle signs are addressed and managed. Nonverbal experience is much more powerful than verbal experience since most of the subtle signs have their origin in nonverbal experience and nonverbal memory. Finally, Sally eventually did what she was asked to do and praised for doing what was expected. In this manner, Sally experiences acceptance of who she is while becoming socialized.

These sensitivities do not constitute a mental illness or Reactive Attachment Disorder. They are subtle signs of attachment sensitivities. So, what can you do?

First, the most important thing you can do is maintain an attuned emotionally close and positive relationship with your child even when your child is being nasty or pushing your buttons…it is at those times that the child most needs to feel loved and loveable, even if the behavior is unacceptable. First, create a connection with your child and then discipline.

Second, bringing the child in close is better than allowing the child to be alone or isolate him or her self.

Third, talk for the child. Put words to what the child is feeling. This allows the child to feel understood by you, maintains a connection, and helps assuage the fear of rejection and abandonment. It also helps the child become self-aware, models verbal behavior, and facilitates a sense of emotional attunement between parent and child.

Fourth, don’t make food a battle. A child who steals food or hoards food usually has sound emotional reasons for this. Providing the child with food so that your child experiences you as provider is often the solution. Put a bowl of fruit in the child’s room. (Be sure to keep if filled. It does not good if you provide and then leave an empty bowl!) In some instances, I’ve recommended that the parents provide the child with a fanny pack and keep it stocked with snacks. This usually quickly ends hoarding and stealing of food.

Fifth, for the child who is overly independent, doing for the child and not encouraging precocious independence is helpful. So, making a game of brushing your six-year old’s teeth, dressing your seven-year-old, or playing at feeding a nine-year-old, are all ways to demonstrate that you will care for the child. Keeping it playful and light, allows the child to experience what the child needs and helps eliminate hurtful battles.

Sixth, Time-In rather than Time-out. When your child is becoming dysregulated, they need you to regulate their emotions. You do that by reflecting the child’s emotions back to the child; putting into words what you think the child may be feeling. In this manner you demonstrate that you can accept what the child is feeling, that feelings can be tolerated and discussed; even if the behavior will be disciplined at a later time. Remember; first connect with you child, then discipline.

Seventh, reduce shame. Avoid shaming parenting methods and interactions that might be harsh or punitive. If the child is already experiencing too much shame, increasing that will only be destructive to the child and your relationship with your child. You set the emotional tone for the relationship, so keeping things positive is important. So, as an example, your seven year old has just screamed at you, “I hate you,” because you said it’s time to go to bed. I’d start by reflecting the child’s feelings back to the child as you walk the child to bed with your arm around the child, “Boy, you are really mad that you have to go to bed now.” “You sure don’t want to go to bed now. I wonder what you think is making me send you to bed now? … Maybe you just think I’m being mean?” Through this sort of dialogue you are demonstrating your acceptance of the child’s feelings and your interest in the child’s thinking and feeling…you are showing the child how to reflect on one’s inner life. The model I suggest for parents is to create a healing PLACE (being Playful, Loving, Accepting, Curious, and Empathic. You can read about this in Creating Capacity for Attachment, edited by Arthur Becker-Weidman, Ph.D., & Deborah Shell, MA, Wood ‘N’ Barnes, OK).

In conclusion, these subtle signs are important reminders that our children have ongoing sensitivities that as parents we must address. Responsive and sensitive communication is essential. Attachment is a function of reciprocal communication; attachment does not reside in the child alone. It is very important for the parent to manage and facilitate this attuned connection within a framework of clear limits and boundaries, natural consequences, and firm loving discipline.

References: Creating Capacity for Attachment, edited by Arthur Becker-Weidman, Ph.D., & Deborah Shell, MA, Wood ‘N’ Barnes, OK

Fringe Groups/Critics

The section on fringe groups that stated "Jean Mercer, PhD, AKA Gene Lester. Mr. Lester/Mercer ... " seemed problematic because of concerns about defamation. It appears to imply that Jean Mercer is transsexual, transgendered, or something similar, which she is not. So, I reverted to the earlier version of this page that did not contain the defamation.

Jean Mercer

I don't know what gender Jean Mercer/Gene Lester is or was. But Jean Mercer's C.V. clearly states that Jean Mercer and Gene Lester are one and the same person. Gene Lester had a name change to Jean Mercer. Jean Mercer's resume lists publications by Gene Lester and states that Jean Mercer was Gene Lester. So, this is not defamation, merely a statement of fact.

Jean Mercer's CV states that her previous name was Gene Lester. Her current name is Jean Mercer. At all times, Jean Mercer/Gene Lester was female. So, she should not be referred to as "Mr." and there is no need to say "AKA" because her current name is Jean Mercer. When someone who knows she is female intentionally refers to her as "Mr.", as the author of the edit does, it is potentially defamatory.

I don't know if Jean Mercer is male or female. I do know from reading the bio's of Gene Lester on those books and articles that Gene Lester was male. So, Mr. may or may not be correct at this time. The material on the website at the school (Richard Stockton College) in MJ where Mercer is at is silent on gender.

Gene Lester was not male. You read the bio incorrectly. Regardless of whether you knew her gender before, you are now put on notice: She is and has always been female. If you had a question about her gender, you should have asked her about it instead of making an assumption.

IS THIS PRODUCTIVE?

An interesting exchange. Who are these people? Aren't we supposed to sign our talk references and edits? Anyway, obviously there are strong feelings here and we should be sensitive to them. I'm not sure what difference Dr. Mercer's gender makes anyway to this page or the content. I'd suggest we focus on the material at hand and not be side tracked. --User:AWeidman9:52, April 24, 2006

My only information was what is on the resume and in the bio of various books and articles published by Jean Mercer and previously by Gene Lester as well as what the school reports. I do think these exchanges are unproductive. These attack tactics seem to be typical of what these advocacy groups do, which is a reason that their materials don't seem relevant to an encyclopedia...I notice that you remain anon. User:AWeidman April 24, 2006.

Mediation

Because of continued personal attacks on me I have turned this over to mediation.

I think mediation is a great idea. The Misplaced Pages moderators should have a fun time reviewing the original edits AWeidman made implying that Jean Mercer was a "Mr."

VANDALISM

As shown on this Misplaced Pages history page, somebody tried to edit the "Critics" links so as to make them not work: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Attachment_disorder&diff=50077472&oldid=49999931 The IP in question was 68.66.160.228, and according to a web tool I used it is located in Buffalo, NY. Does anyone have a thought as to who from the Buffalo area might have been responsible? Is this sufficient to ban this IP?

--

On the discussion page for the "Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy", there is this identification: Arthur Becker-Weidman, Ph.D., Center For Family Development 716-810-0790 AWeidman@Concentric.net. DMOZ details for the Center's domain name (CENTER4FAMILYDEVELOP.COM) indicates that it is located in Williamsville, New York, a suburb of Buffalo to the northeast. Of course, all this is just circumstantial evidence... The IP address belongs to Adelphia Cable and likely is randomly assigned to its cable internet customers, so banning it in particular might not be practical unless it has been dedicated to a single user. 206.81.65.234 19:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Add back material

The material previously deleted was not "stolen" as it is covered under fair use provisions of the copyright code. But, more to the point, I hold the copyright to that article and I am allowed to use it as I see fit...although I have edited it some here. Dr. Art 22:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

SERIOUS PROBLEMS OF CONTENT

As far as I can see, attachment is "explained" but never defined in this material. In addition, the occurrence of attachment thoughts, behaviors, and feelings is attributed to a posited "attachment cycle" involving need and gratification. I have long been curious about the source of this "cycle" idea, which certainly does not emerge from Bowlby's work, having somewhat more in common with Freudian theory, but resonating most with Schopenhauer.Perhaps the author of that section could cite a source for the "cycle" explanation.

If contributors will try to see how difficult it would be to get from the "cycle" to Bowlby's concept of an internal working model of social relationships, they may become aware of the conceptual problems here. One approach that I have found useful is to consider attachment events at different periods of development, from the engagement behaviors of the newborn to parental bonding in adulthood. When you see that the underlying concept has to work for all those developmental periods, it becomes obvious that the "cycle" is irrelevant to attachment, although cyclical need and gratification could be related to development of a sense of time and other cognitive abilities. The development of attachment and the working model at any stage is better considered as a transactional process in which a younger and an older person gradually alter their expectations and attitudes toward each other. Need and gratification are commonly mixed in with these events, but their absence would not eliminate attachment. Jean Mercer 21:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, folks, when I look at this in the text i seem to have created a long streamer and i don't know how to fix it.Jean Mercer 21:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

This article is much improved now. It is much clearer and to the point. Makes a good reference article. RalphLender 17:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the content is now excellent. Good work all. DPeterson 01:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)