Revision as of 20:31, 2 May 2016 view sourceLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators760,396 edits Removing request for arbitration: declined by the Committee← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:59, 9 May 2016 view source SheriffIsInTown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,199 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | ||
== ] == | |||
'''Initiated by ''' ] | ] | '''at''' 20:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
=== Involved parties === | |||
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator --> | |||
*{{userlinks|SheriffIsInTown}}, ''filing party'' | |||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | |||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> | |||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | |||
Krzyhorse22 has been reported under ] four times, on ] by ], on ] by ], on ] by ] and on ] by me. | |||
=== Statement by SheriffIsInTown === | |||
Lagoo sab created a total of 100 socks between 2009 and 2013. The last confirmed sock of Lagoo sab was blocked on 6 November 2013. Krzyhorse22 was created on 29 August 2014 and there is a 9 months difference between the last sock block and the creation of Krzyhorse22. Considering the time difference, there was never going to be a successful CU because of all of the confirmed socks being stale. The cases only can be decided based on the behavioral evidence present in the filings and according to my analysis of all these four cases, there was more than enough evidence each time to block the user based on behavioral evidence e.g. ] as many users have been blocked behaviorally in the past with fraction of the evidence presented as was presented in these filings. There are other editors who have expressed their opinions in those filings such as ] that evidence suggests that Krzyhorse22 is a Lagoo sab sock. The closing admin Bbb23 for the last filing has expressed in the past that he does not do blocks based on behavioral evidence rather he only matches IP and the IP addresses do not match. He has also hinted that the location of Krzyhorse22 might be the same as Lagoo's previous socks but that is irrelevant considering the topics they edit. Based on that admission, i also had the feeling that nobody even evaluated the evidence presented in the last filing to decide whether there is a behavioral match except off-course Magog the Ogre who is not a CheckUser. Thus, i am requesting the committee to analyze the behavioral evidence presented in last four filings, more importantly the last two because they had bulk of evidence in them. Arbitration Committee is the last resort to resolve any matter on Misplaced Pages and considering the history of disruption by Lagoo sab socks previously and by Krzyhorse22, it is important that Committee reviews this case and give their final decision in this matter. If Committee finds enough evidence then this user has violated ] by not declaring all previous 100 accounts and by not following the proper procedure for appealing the block and only coming back when the appeal is granted. | |||
=== Statement by {Non-party} === | |||
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information. | |||
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * --> | |||
=== Clerk notes === | |||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' | |||
* | |||
=== ]: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0> === | |||
{{anchor|1=]: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)</small> | |||
* |
Revision as of 20:59, 9 May 2016
Shortcut
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
] | 9 May 2016 | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lagoo sab
Initiated by Sheriff | ☎ 911 | at 20:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Involved parties
- SheriffIsInTown (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Krzyhorse22 has been reported under Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lagoo sab four times, on 20 November 2014 by Faizan, on 04 October 2015 by Smsarmad, on 24 November 2015 by LouisAragon and on 14 April 2016 by me.
Statement by SheriffIsInTown
Lagoo sab created a total of 100 socks between 2009 and 2013. The last confirmed sock of Lagoo sab was blocked on 6 November 2013. Krzyhorse22 was created on 29 August 2014 and there is a 9 months difference between the last sock block and the creation of Krzyhorse22. Considering the time difference, there was never going to be a successful CU because of all of the confirmed socks being stale. The cases only can be decided based on the behavioral evidence present in the filings and according to my analysis of all these four cases, there was more than enough evidence each time to block the user based on behavioral evidence e.g. WP:DUCK as many users have been blocked behaviorally in the past with fraction of the evidence presented as was presented in these filings. There are other editors who have expressed their opinions in those filings such as Magog the Ogre that evidence suggests that Krzyhorse22 is a Lagoo sab sock. The closing admin Bbb23 for the last filing has expressed in the past that he does not do blocks based on behavioral evidence rather he only matches IP and the IP addresses do not match. He has also hinted that the location of Krzyhorse22 might be the same as Lagoo's previous socks but that is irrelevant considering the topics they edit. Based on that admission, i also had the feeling that nobody even evaluated the evidence presented in the last filing to decide whether there is a behavioral match except off-course Magog the Ogre who is not a CheckUser. Thus, i am requesting the committee to analyze the behavioral evidence presented in last four filings, more importantly the last two because they had bulk of evidence in them. Arbitration Committee is the last resort to resolve any matter on Misplaced Pages and considering the history of disruption by Lagoo sab socks previously and by Krzyhorse22, it is important that Committee reviews this case and give their final decision in this matter. If Committee finds enough evidence then this user has violated WP:SOCK by not declaring all previous 100 accounts and by not following the proper procedure for appealing the block and only coming back when the appeal is granted.
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lagoo sab: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)