| Revision as of 22:13, 29 August 2006 editVikramsingh (talk | contribs)2,916 edits quotes← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:15, 29 August 2006 edit undoVikramsingh (talk | contribs)2,916 edits →Kancha Ilaiah's views: QuotesNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| ==Kancha Ilaiah's views: Quotes== | ==Kancha Ilaiah's views: Quotes== | ||
| ⚫ | * "Shout that we hate Hinduism, we hate Brahmanism. Capture the Hindu temples by expelling the Brahmins from them". | ||
| ⚫ | * "Brahmins don't have right to call themselves Indian". | ||
| * "Nearly 90 per cent of Brahmin students in the country are in English medium convent schools. They are sending their children to Christian schools and at the same time attacking Christian missionaries." | |||
| * "I am a product of the post-Independence rural caste whom Brahminical forces wanted to destroy. So I will continue to agitate against Hinduism," he says. | |||
| * "Hinduism is a religion of violence". | * "Hinduism is a religion of violence". | ||
| * "For Hinduism, for Hindu dharma, resolving of a conflict is only by killing". | * "For Hinduism, for Hindu dharma, resolving of a conflict is only by killing". | ||
| * "If a Dalitist state and society is established I think we will see a very bright future for the whole country." | * "If a Dalitist state and society is established I think we will see a very bright future for the whole country." | ||
| * "Hinduism has destroyed all positive elements that normally exist in a human being" | * "Hinduism has destroyed all positive elements that normally exist in a human being" | ||
| ⚫ | * "Shout that we hate Hinduism, we hate Brahmanism. Capture the Hindu temples by expelling the Brahmins from them". | ||
| ⚫ | * "Brahmins don't have right to call themselves Indian". | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 22:15, 29 August 2006
Kancha Ilaiah is the Chairman of the Political Science department at Osmania University, a social activist and author. He is a major ideological figure in the movement that calls itself Anti-Brahmanism and claims to be a movement for the empowerment of the Dalits , but is often labelled as anti-Hindu by his critics, both Hindu and Muslim . He was born into Kuruma Golla, an 'other backward caste' (not Dalit) family on October 5 1952 and was brought up in a small south Indian village. His family's main profession was sheep farming. He earned his doctorate degree in political science at the Osmania University in Hyderabad, India. His Ph. D thesis was based on Gautama Buddha's political philosophy.
He is an outspoken activist in the Dalit-Bahujan (Scheduled and Backwards Castes) movement. He has criticized the practices of caste and untouchability. Recently he testified before a subcommittee U.S. Congress against the practice of untouchability and urged the US Government to work with the Indian government to end what he said was the persecution of Muslims, Christians, and other oppressed people groups in India.
His description of the relationship between communities in India has been criticised by columnist Francois Gautier as being biased and unrepresentative, and having a hidden agenda of deceptively converting Dalits to Christianity and turning them against Hindus.
He joined hands in this campaign with the All India Christian Council, headed by Dr. Joseph D'Souza and other Indian Christian activists . Ilaiah and D'Souza are associated with the USA based Dalit Freedom Network, a charitable organization working for the rights of India's Dalits - believed by some to promote aggressive and socially divisive missionary activities - which actively participated in the Californian Hindu textbook controversy, opposing edits proposed by Hindu advocacy groups and scholars. They believed that the edits promoted a "biased Brahminical view", a claim denied by the the advocacy groups.
According to Joseph D'Souza, Kancha Ilaiah has served as the "influential ideologue" for the "Quit Hinduism" movement leading to a mass rally on Dec 6th, 2002 .
He is the author of several books written in English, including
- Why I Am Not a Hindu: A Sudra critique of Hindutva philosophy, culture and political economy
- God as Political Philosopher--Buddha's Challenge to Brahminism
- Democracy in India --- A Hollow Shell (edited by Arthur Bonner)
- Buffalo Nationalism--A critique of spiritual fascism
His book, Why I Am Not A Hindu has been a best-seller in India and is widely read around the world. However, it has also drawn severe condemnations from Hindus and Hinduism experts, who note that the book reflects a shallow understanding of Hindu religion and blissful ignorance of all positive aspects of its philosophy and mythology. In particular, Koenraad Elst criticizes the book as unfairly biased and portraying Hinduism in an exceptional light as discriminatory, while ignoring similar discriminations in other cultures. He writes:
"(Why I am not a Hindu) offers a description of the differences in life style between upper castes and Shudras, with the declared intention of getting the reader indignated at the injustice and absurdity of the typically Hindu castle system. Yet, his testimony unwittingly shows just how similar Hindu caste inequality is to the social inequality in other societies, e.g. Ilaiah’s repeated observation that women are more controlled in upper castes and more assertive and free in lower castes is or was just as true for Confucian China or the feudal and bourgeois societies of Europe .
Ilaiah was censured by Osmania University for publishing "Why I am not a Hindu" in a letter addressed to him by Dr. Pannalal, the Registrar of Osmania University. The registrar conveyed that some articles in popular newspapers on the book were creating social tensions. Therefore, he said that Ilaiah should "write within the canons of conduct of our profession" and his articles "should not accentuate prejudices and inflame hatred among various sections of society."
Ilaiah has responded in interviews that his writings are an attempt to reduce prejudices and that they have "not led to riots". He has also said that the book aims to suggest ways to "eliminate the caste system" and proposes "unity on an equal basis".
The book purports to the life-experience of the Dalits and Other Backward Castes and alleges that their poverty-ridden experience holds little connection to the Brahmin religious experience. By explaining this dichotomy from his own personal experience as an OBC, he advocates the "Dalitization" of Indian culture. As Ilaiah claims, the Dalit philosophy prizes productivity over personal pleasure and values the graciousness of community over the "elevation of Brahmin men" at the expense of women and Dalits/OBCs. Ilaiah asserts that this shift in societal thinking will enable India to become a more prosperous and egalitarian society.
Ilaiah is a controversial figure because of what some have called rabidly anti-Brahmin rhetoric and hypocritical methods of argument.
Kancha Ilaiah's views: Quotes
- "Hinduism is a religion of violence".
- "For Hinduism, for Hindu dharma, resolving of a conflict is only by killing".
- "If a Dalitist state and society is established I think we will see a very bright future for the whole country."
- "Hinduism has destroyed all positive elements that normally exist in a human being"
- "Shout that we hate Hinduism, we hate Brahmanism. Capture the Hindu temples by expelling the Brahmins from them".
- "Brahmins don't have right to call themselves Indian".
References
- Archive of article on Himal Magazine
- Who are the real Dalits of India?Gautier's Critique of the U.S. Congress Subcommittee
- Update on the Aryan Invasion Debate (footnote 75)"
- The Rediff Interview , Dr Kancha Ilaiah
- The Rediff Interview , Dr Kancha Ilaiah
External links
- Interview-1
- Interview-2
- Interview-3
- Kancha Illiah-4
- A Critical Review by Shri M. V. R. Sastry-5
- Interview-6
- Ilaiah's article on reservations-7
- David Frawley
- "Anger Is No Substitute For Substance, MR.Kancha Ilaiah"