Misplaced Pages

Christophany: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:29, 8 July 2016 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,557,309 editsm Dating maintenance tags: {{Request quotation}}← Previous edit Revision as of 17:20, 19 July 2016 edit undoBender235 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors471,641 editsm clean up; http->https (see this RfC) using AWBNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
A '''Christophany''' is an appearance or non-physical manifestation of ]. Traditionally the term refers to visions of Christ after his ], such as the bright light of the ].<ref>Carey C. Newman ''Paul's glory-christology: tradition and rhetoric'' p164 1992 "The thesis defended below can be simply stated: the Damascus Christophany is the interpretive "origin" of Paul's ... That is, the vision of the resurrected and exalted Jesus, the Christophany, was the catalyst for the apostle's ...</ref> A '''Christophany''' is an appearance or non-physical manifestation of ]. Traditionally the term refers to visions of Christ after his ], such as the bright light of the ].<ref>Carey C. Newman ''Paul's glory-christology: tradition and rhetoric'' p164 1992 "The thesis defended below can be simply stated: the Damascus Christophany is the interpretive "origin" of Paul's ... That is, the vision of the resurrected and exalted Jesus, the Christophany, was the catalyst for the apostle's ...</ref>


Also, following the example of ] who identified the ] with the ],<ref>in ''The new Schaff-Herzog encyclopedia of religious knowledge: vol 11,1912 "the practise of the Greek Fathers from Justin Martyr, who identified the "angel of the Lord " with the Logos, furnish excuse for conceiving also the theophanies of the Old Testament as christophanies."</ref> some appearances of angels in the ] are also identified by some Christians as ] appearances of Christ.<ref>] , 2007, "I believe that theophanies in the Old Testament were actually preincarnate appearances of Christ. The principal theophany of the Old Testament is the Angel of the Lord (or, more literally, ''Angel of Yahweh'')"</ref> Also, following the example of ] who identified the ] with the ],<ref>in ''The new Schaff-Herzog encyclopedia of religious knowledge: vol 11,1912 "the practise of the Greek Fathers from Justin Martyr, who identified the "angel of the Lord " with the Logos, furnish excuse for conceiving also the theophanies of the Old Testament as christophanies."</ref> some appearances of angels in the ] are also identified by some Christians as ] appearances of Christ.<ref>] , 2007, "I believe that theophanies in the Old Testament were actually preincarnate appearances of Christ. The principal theophany of the Old Testament is the Angel of the Lord (or, more literally, ''Angel of Yahweh'')"</ref>


==Etymology== ==Etymology==
Line 9: Line 9:


==Usage== ==Usage==
Academics generally use the term solely in relation to the New Testament visions of Christ.{{cn|date=June 2016}} ] (1852) popularised the term in relation to the identification of angels in the Old Testament as Christ.<ref>''Christophany - The doctrine of the manifestations of the Son of God under the economy of the Old Testament'' 1852. Note, though, that the title was added posthumously, and the only use of the word in the book itself is a citation of another scholar.</ref> Academics generally use the term solely in relation to the New Testament visions of Christ.{{citation needed|date=June 2016}} ] (1852) popularised the term in relation to the identification of angels in the Old Testament as Christ.<ref>''Christophany - The doctrine of the manifestations of the Son of God under the economy of the Old Testament'' 1852. Note, though, that the title was added posthumously, and the only use of the word in the book itself is a citation of another scholar.</ref>


The term was used by Albert Joseph Edmunds (1857–1941) in relation to the revealing of Christ in Christianity and Buddhism.<ref>Albert Joseph Edmunds, Masaharieed Anesaki ''Buddhist and Christian Gospels'' 1900? 2009 reprint Page 101 "CHRISTOPHANY: HE WHO SEES THE TRUTH SEES THE LORD. John XIV. 6; 9; 18-21."</ref> The term was used by Albert Joseph Edmunds (1857–1941) in relation to the revealing of Christ in Christianity and Buddhism.<ref>Albert Joseph Edmunds, Masaharieed Anesaki ''Buddhist and Christian Gospels'' 1900? 2009 reprint Page 101 "CHRISTOPHANY: HE WHO SEES THE TRUTH SEES THE LORD. John XIV. 6; 9; 18-21."</ref>
Line 22: Line 22:
{{bibleverse||Genesis|3:8|HE}} was regarded by most ] and medieval commentators as an appearance by the ], or pre-existent Christ,{{citation needed|date=May 2014}} and in art God was always given the features of Jesus until about 1400.<ref>James Hall, ''A History of Ideas and Images in Italian Art'', p. 86, 1983, John Murray, London, ISBN 0719539714</ref>{{request quotation|date=July 2016}} {{bibleverse||Genesis|3:8|HE}} was regarded by most ] and medieval commentators as an appearance by the ], or pre-existent Christ,{{citation needed|date=May 2014}} and in art God was always given the features of Jesus until about 1400.<ref>James Hall, ''A History of Ideas and Images in Italian Art'', p. 86, 1983, John Murray, London, ISBN 0719539714</ref>{{request quotation|date=July 2016}}


A popular Christian understanding of the relationship between ] and Jesus is that Melchizedek is an Old Testament Christophany.<ref>{{cite book|last=Longman|first=Tremper|author-link=Tremper Longman|title=How To Read Genesis|year=2005|page=172|url=http://books.google.com.au/books?id=SKEJ3kT7S2kC&pg=PA172}}</ref> ] interpreted the figure with whom ] spoke in ] as being Christ himself.<ref>{{cite book|last=Bunge|first=Gabriel|title=The Rublev Trinity|year=2007|publisher=]|page=48|url=http://books.google.com.au/books?id=uAC0E0TswtgC&pg=PA48}}</ref> A popular Christian understanding of the relationship between ] and Jesus is that Melchizedek is an Old Testament Christophany.<ref>{{cite book|last=Longman|first=Tremper|author-link=Tremper Longman|title=How To Read Genesis|year=2005|page=172|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SKEJ3kT7S2kC&pg=PA172}}</ref> ] interpreted the figure with whom ] spoke in ] as being Christ himself.<ref>{{cite book|last=Bunge|first=Gabriel|title=The Rublev Trinity|year=2007|publisher=]|page=48|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uAC0E0TswtgC&pg=PA48}}</ref>


] suggests that ] is a "pre-incarnation appearance of Christ in the form of a man."<ref>{{cite book|last=MacMillan|first=J. Douglas|author-link=J. Douglas MacMillan|title=Wrestling with God: Lessons from the life of Jacob|year=1991|publisher=Evangelical Press of Wales|page=56}}</ref> ] suggests that ] is a "pre-incarnation appearance of Christ in the form of a man."<ref>{{cite book|last=MacMillan|first=J. Douglas|author-link=J. Douglas MacMillan|title=Wrestling with God: Lessons from the life of Jacob|year=1991|publisher=Evangelical Press of Wales|page=56}}</ref>
Line 31: Line 31:


==Visions of Christ after the New Testament== ==Visions of Christ after the New Testament==
{{Main|Visions of Jesus and Mary}} {{Main article|Visions of Jesus and Mary}}
A vision is not usually described as a Christophany.{{cn|date=June 2016}} A vision is not usually described as a Christophany.{{citation needed|date=June 2016}}
* ] is believed to have had a precise vision of the Blessed Trinity, as is illustrated by ]. * ] is believed to have had a precise vision of the Blessed Trinity, as is illustrated by ].
* ] was a deep mystic who claimed several christophanies about the Trinity. * ] was a deep mystic who claimed several christophanies about the Trinity.

Revision as of 17:20, 19 July 2016

The pre-existent Christ expels Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden; St Albans Psalter

A Christophany is an appearance or non-physical manifestation of Christ. Traditionally the term refers to visions of Christ after his ascension, such as the bright light of the Damascus Christophany.

Also, following the example of Justin Martyr who identified the Angel of the Lord with the Logos, some appearances of angels in the Hebrew Bible are also identified by some Christians as preincarnate appearances of Christ.

Etymology

The etymology is from the Greek Χριστός (Christos) and the Greek ending "phany" from the verb phaneroō, to be revealed or to manifest. This noun is derived by direct comparison with the term theophany (theo-phaneia).

Usage

Academics generally use the term solely in relation to the New Testament visions of Christ. George Balderston Kidd (1852) popularised the term in relation to the identification of angels in the Old Testament as Christ.

The term was used by Albert Joseph Edmunds (1857–1941) in relation to the revealing of Christ in Christianity and Buddhism.

Since the work of James Borland (1978) usage of the term in conservative Christian publications related to Old Testament appearances of Christ has multiplied exponentially.

New Testament

The Conversion of Saint Paul, a 1600 painting by the Italian artist Caravaggio.

A New Testament Christophany is Paul's vision of Christ on the road to Damascus, and the subsequent one of Ananias. Another New Testament example is John's vision of the Son of Man, recounted in Revelation 1:12-18.

Claimed examples of Christophanies in the Hebrew Bible

Genesis 3:8 was regarded by most Church Fathers and medieval commentators as an appearance by the Logos, or pre-existent Christ, and in art God was always given the features of Jesus until about 1400.

A popular Christian understanding of the relationship between Melchizedek and Jesus is that Melchizedek is an Old Testament Christophany. Romanos the Melodist interpreted the figure with whom Abraham spoke in Genesis 18:1–8 as being Christ himself.

J. Douglas MacMillan suggests that angel with whom Jacob wrestles is a "pre-incarnation appearance of Christ in the form of a man."

Some church fathers such as Origen and later theologians such as Martin Luther believed another example is the "Man" who appears to Joshua, and identifies himself as "the commander of the army of the LORD." (Joshua 5:13-15). The standard argument that this was in fact Christ is that he accepted Joshua's prostrate worship, whereas angels refuse such worship ; see Revelation 19:9-10. Additionally, he declared the ground to be holy; elsewhere in the Bible, only things or places set aside for God or claimed by him are called holy; see Exodus 3:5. Jewish commentators reading the same text do not accept that this figure was Christ (or even Adonai).

Jonathan Edwards identified an example in Daniel 3:25, when the fourth man in the furnace is described as “… and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God" or "like a son of the gods." The "Suffering servant", from the Book of Isaiah is believed by many Christians to be Jesus. The vision of Isaiah (Is 6) may be regarded as a Christophany. It appears to have been seen as such by John the evangelist, who, following a quote from this chapter, adds 'Isaiah said this because he saw His glory and spoke of Him' (John 12:41).

Visions of Christ after the New Testament

Main article: Visions of Jesus and Mary

A vision is not usually described as a Christophany.

See also

References

  1. Carey C. Newman Paul's glory-christology: tradition and rhetoric p164 1992 "The thesis defended below can be simply stated: the Damascus Christophany is the interpretive "origin" of Paul's ... That is, the vision of the resurrected and exalted Jesus, the Christophany, was the catalyst for the apostle's ...
  2. in The new Schaff-Herzog encyclopedia of religious knowledge: vol 11,1912 "the practise of the Greek Fathers from Justin Martyr, who identified the "angel of the Lord " with the Logos, furnish excuse for conceiving also the theophanies of the Old Testament as christophanies."
  3. Ron Rhodes What Does the Bible Say About...?, 2007, p.125 "I believe that theophanies in the Old Testament were actually preincarnate appearances of Christ. The principal theophany of the Old Testament is the Angel of the Lord (or, more literally, Angel of Yahweh)"
  4. Christophany - The doctrine of the manifestations of the Son of God under the economy of the Old Testament 1852. Note, though, that the title was added posthumously, and the only use of the word in the book itself is a citation of another scholar.
  5. Albert Joseph Edmunds, Masaharieed Anesaki Buddhist and Christian Gospels 1900? 2009 reprint Page 101 "CHRISTOPHANY: HE WHO SEES THE TRUTH SEES THE LORD. John XIV. 6; 9; 18-21."
  6. James A. Borland, Christ in the Old Testament: Old Testament Appearances of Christ in Human Form, Chicago: Moody, 1978; 2nd ed. Fearn: Mentor, 1999; fresh reprint 2010. Borland's original doctoral work carried the main title Christophanies (ThD diss.; Grace Theological Seminary, 1976).
  7. James Hall, A History of Ideas and Images in Italian Art, p. 86, 1983, John Murray, London, ISBN 0719539714
  8. Longman, Tremper (2005). How To Read Genesis. p. 172.
  9. Bunge, Gabriel (2007). The Rublev Trinity. St Vladimir's Seminary Press. p. 48.
  10. MacMillan, J. Douglas (1991). Wrestling with God: Lessons from the life of Jacob. Evangelical Press of Wales. p. 56.
  11. Harstad, Adolph (2004). Concordia Commentary on Joshua. Concordia Publishing House. p. 254.
  12. The works of Jonathan Edwards 1835 p564 "And the prophet Daniel, in the historical part of his book, gives an account of a very remarkable appearance of Christ in Nebuchadnezzar's furnace, with Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego."
Categories: