Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for mediation/Terry Goodkind: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for mediation Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:59, 31 August 2006 editMystar (talk | contribs)971 edits A concern over here to fore unknown entity WMU← Previous edit Revision as of 12:00, 31 August 2006 edit undoMystar (talk | contribs)971 edits →Opening statements: I meant WLU, sorry ;pNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
] 04:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC) ] 04:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


I also have a problem with WLU suddenly popping up and wanting to participate. WMU has had nothing of any concern previous to this particular situation. WMU is not identified and who the old SN was/is, and there for it must be presumed that he/she is quite possibly looking to alter the consensus from a positive direction. WMU could be friend or foe, so to speak. But the fact that WMU suddenly and with out any previous edit history or interest in Goodkind, let along Wiki in general, is suspect in the extreme. I also have a problem with WLU suddenly popping up and wanting to participate. WLU has had nothing of any concern previous to this particular situation. WLU is not identified and who the old SN was/is, and there for it must be presumed that he/she is quite possibly looking to alter the consensus from a positive direction. WLU could be friend or foe, so to speak. But the fact that WLU suddenly and with out any previous edit history or interest in Goodkind, let along Wiki in general, is suspect in the extreme.
] 11:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC) ] 11:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:00, 31 August 2006

Opening statements

If that is the correect method. I've sit/sat on several boards (IRL) as an advisor, but I've not done this before, so I'm speculating that this is a correct coruse of action.

Well, do we want half-truths? Or do we want be "honest" and publish fact? Goodkind has a well-written and colorful series that deserves an equally well-written encyclopedic page. As Omni stated, "Let's face it, we all agree that allowing a lie or a half-truth is a discredit to all who view and edit Misplaced Pages". I couldn't agree more. The bottom line is this; some have shamelessly edited his work simply because they don't like the way the series is going. That in itself if not reason or license to post devaluating opinion meant to smear the man. Again, I say fact IS fact and is pertinent to being encyclopedic knowledge. Anyone?

Mystar 04:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I also have a problem with WLU suddenly popping up and wanting to participate. WLU has had nothing of any concern previous to this particular situation. WLU is not identified and who the old SN was/is, and there for it must be presumed that he/she is quite possibly looking to alter the consensus from a positive direction. WLU could be friend or foe, so to speak. But the fact that WLU suddenly and with out any previous edit history or interest in Goodkind, let along Wiki in general, is suspect in the extreme. Mystar 11:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)