Misplaced Pages:Article probation: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:27, 31 August 2006 edit68.39.174.238 (talk) Missed ending ]]← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:59, 2 September 2006 edit undoFred Bauder (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users46,115 edits copyeditNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{shortcut\|]}}		{{shortcut\|]}}
	Articles which are the focus of dispute that comes before the ] may be placed on '''article probation'''. The usual reason is the dispute in question ~~results in~~ point of view editing, sustained edit warring, or other quality and policy issues. The Committee may continue to exercise jurisdiction over such articles until the major problems with the articles have been resolved by the Misplaced Pages editing process.		Articles which are the focus of dispute that comes before the ] may be placed on '''article probation'''. The usual reason is the dispute in question involves point of view editing, sustained edit warring, or other quality and policy issues. The Committee may continue to exercise jurisdiction over such articles until the major problems with the articles have been resolved by the Misplaced Pages editing process.
	{{dispute-resolution}}		{{dispute-resolution}}
	This remedy permits more flexibility with legitimate articles which have serious problems, and allows more effective resolution of disputes where the ~~articel~~ is more in need of improvement then the disputants of sanctions. The Arbitration Committee may make recommendations regarding improvement of articles but shall not involve themselves with content issues.		This remedy permits more flexibility with legitimate articles which have serious problems, and allows more effective resolution of disputes where the article is more in need of improvement then the disputants are in need of sanctions. The Arbitration Committee may make recommendations regarding improvement of articles but shall not involve themselves with content issues.

	Continuing jurisdiction may involve monitoring of the editing of articles over a period of time and the application of restrictions on editing by users who engage in edit warring or other disruptive behavior. This gives an opportunity for users who have edit warred or disrupted the article in the past by tendentious editing to change their behavior to more productive modes.		Continuing jurisdiction may involve monitoring of the editing of articles over a period of time and the application of restrictions on editing by users who engage in edit warring or other disruptive behavior. This gives an opportunity for users who have edit warred or disrupted the article in the past by tendentious editing to change their behavior to more productive modes.

	When the Committee believes that the ~~articlel~~ is no longer subject to the disputes which lead to the probation, it may revoke probation by passing a "]".		When the Committee believes that the article is no longer subject to the disputes which lead to the probation, it may revoke probation by passing a "]".

	==Template==		==Template==

Revision as of 13:59, 2 September 2006

Shortcut

]

Articles which are the focus of dispute that comes before the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee may be placed on article probation. The usual reason is the dispute in question involves point of view editing, sustained edit warring, or other quality and policy issues. The Committee may continue to exercise jurisdiction over such articles until the major problems with the articles have been resolved by the Misplaced Pages editing process.

Dispute resolution (Requests)
Tips
Assume good faith Use etiquette Be civil Be open to compromise Discuss on talk pages Failure to discuss Help desk (Request)
Content disputes
Third opinion (Request) Mediation Noticeboards Request comments (Request) Resolution noticeboard (Request)
Conduct disputes
Administrator assistance (Request) Arbitration (Request)
v t e

This remedy permits more flexibility with legitimate articles which have serious problems, and allows more effective resolution of disputes where the article is more in need of improvement then the disputants are in need of sanctions. The Arbitration Committee may make recommendations regarding improvement of articles but shall not involve themselves with content issues.

Continuing jurisdiction may involve monitoring of the editing of articles over a period of time and the application of restrictions on editing by users who engage in edit warring or other disruptive behavior. This gives an opportunity for users who have edit warred or disrupted the article in the past by tendentious editing to change their behavior to more productive modes.

When the Committee believes that the article is no longer subject to the disputes which lead to the probation, it may revoke probation by passing a "motion in a prior case".

Template

The template {{article probation}} is normally placed on the talk page of the article under probation. It may alternatively be used on the article page itself.

Arbitration cases ordering probation

Pages under probation

Can be seen at Category:Articles on probation

Category:

Misplaced Pages dispute resolution