Revision as of 08:34, 29 October 2004 editPhilHibbs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,618 editsm "pwn" as a mainstream term← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:26, 11 November 2004 edit undoTexture (talk | contribs)19,623 edits Image:Fitting-expansion-card.JPGNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
In ], you have re-instated "pwn" as a mainstream term for total domination. I have never gotten into a revert war, and I'm not going to now over something as inconsequential as this, but can you explain why you think this could possibly be described as mainstream usage? ] 08:34, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC) | In ], you have re-instated "pwn" as a mainstream term for total domination. I have never gotten into a revert war, and I'm not going to now over something as inconsequential as this, but can you explain why you think this could possibly be described as mainstream usage? ] 08:34, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
Hi. Please remove ] from related articles before tagging it for deletion. Images should not be tagged for deletion if they are still used in an article. - ]]] 15:26, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:26, 11 November 2004
If you would like to talk to me, do it on this page. The easiest way to do it is to click the "+" button. "pwn" as a mainstream termIn Internet slang, you have re-instated "pwn" as a mainstream term for total domination. I have never gotten into a revert war, and I'm not going to now over something as inconsequential as this, but can you explain why you think this could possibly be described as mainstream usage? PhilHibbs 08:34, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC) Image:Fitting-expansion-card.JPGHi. Please remove Image:Fitting-expansion-card.JPG from related articles before tagging it for deletion. Images should not be tagged for deletion if they are still used in an article. - Tεxτurε 15:26, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) |