| Revision as of 02:16, 6 September 2006 editSalvNaut (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,444 edits revert - Levi. P. What do you think you are doing? What majority of editors? what mistakes? everything was discussed (with you!)← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:41, 6 September 2006 edit undoMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits no consensus for these changesNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{NPOV}} | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| '''Steven Earl Jones''' is a professor of ] at ]. His research includes ] |
'''Steven Earl Jones''' is a professor of ] at ]. His research includes ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite news |first = Justin|last = Pope|title = 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Thriving|url = http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2279929|work = ABC News > U.S.|publisher = ABCNews Internet Ventures|date = 2006-08-06|accessdate = 2006-08-21}}</ref> He is co-chair of ] and co-edits the Journal of 9/11 Studies.<ref></ref> In the 1980s Jones popularized the term '']'', but his experimental work was significantly different from the more controversial cold fusion experiments of ] and ]. <ref>{{cite web |last = |first = | year = | url = http://www.newenergytimes.com/PR/ColdFusionFAQ.htm |title = Frequently Asked Questions About The Field of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions | work = A Subset of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science |publisher = New Energy Times | accessdate = 2006-07-27}}</ref> | ||
| Jones is currently investigating<ref></ref> the ] that the ] Twin Towers and ] were brought down by pre-positioned cutter charges, one of the various ] surrounding the ].<ref name="Chronicle">{{cite web |last = Gravois |first = John | year = June 23, 2006 | url = http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i42/42a01001.htm |title = Professors of Paranoia? Academics give a scholarly stamp to 9/11 conspiracy theories| work = |publisher = The Chronicle of Higher Education | accessdate = 2006-07-27}}</ref> | |||
| ==Education== | ==Education== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
| Jones has also been a collaborator in several experiments, including experiments at ] (]), The National High Energy Laboratory, ] (]), and the ] at ]. | Jones has also been a collaborator in several experiments, including experiments at ] (]), The National High Energy Laboratory, ] (]), and the ] at ]. | ||
| Jones specializes in ], ] and ]<ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy |title = Steven E. Jones' biography at BYU | accessdate = 2006-08-03}}</ref>. | Jones specializes in ], ] and ] <ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy |title = Steven E. Jones' biography at BYU | accessdate = 2006-08-03}}</ref>. | ||
| Jones has written a paper entitled ''"Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America"'' in which he used archeological evidence to support the claims of ] (founder of the ]) that ] had visited the ] after his ], an event chronicled in the ]. The evidence pointed to is ] depictions of deities which have ] like markings on their hands.<ref name="Christ">{{cite web |last = Jones |first = Steven E. | year = | url = http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/rel491/handstext%20and%20figures.htm |title = Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America | work = |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-07-27}}</ref> | Jones has written a paper entitled ''"Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America"'' in which he used archeological evidence to support the claims of ] (founder of the ]) that ] had visited the ] after his ], an event chronicled in the ]. The evidence pointed to is ] depictions of deities which have ] like markings on their hands. <ref name="Christ">{{cite web |last = Jones |first = Steven E. | year = | url = http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/jones/rel491/handstext%20and%20figures.htm |title = Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America | work = |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-07-27}}</ref> | ||
| ==Cold fusion== | ==Cold fusion== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
| A New York Times article says that while peer reviewers were quite critical of Pons and Fleishchmann's research they did not apply such criticism to Jones' much more modest, theoretically supported findings. Although critics insisted that his results likely stemmed from experimental error,<ref>{{cite web |last = Browne |first = Malcolm W. |year = 1989 |url = http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/050399sci-cold-fusion.html |title = Physicists Debunk Claim Of a New Kind of Fusion |work = Science |publisher = The New York Times | A New York Times article says that while peer reviewers were quite critical of Pons and Fleishchmann's research they did not apply such criticism to Jones' much more modest, theoretically supported findings. Although critics insisted that his results likely stemmed from experimental error,<ref>{{cite web |last = Browne |first = Malcolm W. |year = 1989 |url = http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/050399sci-cold-fusion.html |title = Physicists Debunk Claim Of a New Kind of Fusion |work = Science |publisher = The New York Times | ||
| |accessdate = 2006-07-14}}</ref> most of the reviewing physicists indicated that he was a careful scientist. |
|accessdate = 2006-07-14}}</ref> most of the reviewing physicists indicated that he was a careful scientist. | ||
| |last = Czerski, K. and Huke, A. and Biller, A. and Heide, P. and Hoeft, M. and Ruprecht, G. | |||
| |year = 2001 |url = http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CzerskiKenhancemen.pdf |title = Enhancement of the electron screening effect for d+ d fusion reactions in metallic environments |filetype = pdf |publisher = Europhysics Letters}} Volume 54, number 4, pages 449-455</ref> | |||
| ==WTC collapse hypothesis== | ==WTC collapse hypothesis== | ||
| Jones has written a paper regarding the ], entitled ''"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"''. |
Jones has written a paper regarding the ], entitled ''"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"''. In his paper, Jones cites what he considers evidence which he believes supports the hypothesis that the ] was brought down, not by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges and ]. <ref>{{cite web |last = Jones |first = Steven E. | year = | url = http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html |title = Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? | work = |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-07-27}}</ref> | ||
| Jones has compiled a presentation, ''"Answers to Objections and Questions,"'' in which he seeks to answer objections and detail certain aspects of his views. With regard to his findings, Jones says they are ''"compelling to many, but one needs to be cautious until results are checked and published in a peer-reviewed journal."'' He also says ''"It is important scientifically to have an independent analyses performed, to verify the presence of thermite signature chemical elements. And to publish results in a peer reviewed journal. Realistically, both groups will probably need to submit simultaneously to be published in a major journal like ]."'' <ref name=AnsQJones>{{cite web |last = Jones |first = Steven E.| year = July 18, 2006 | url = http://www.journalof911studies.com/JonesAnswersQuestionsWorldTradeCenter.pdf | format= pdf |title = Answers to Objections and Questions | work = |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-08-05}}</ref> | |||
| Jones was also a speaker at the "]." <ref></ref> | |||
| On August 7, 2006, Jones appeared on ]’s morning radio show on ] in ]. During the broadcast, Jones postulated that it would take approximately 1000 pounds of thermite to take down each of the WTC towers. When Ross asked Jones to describe the possible number and positioning of the charges, Jones consulted the Internet and described on-air that it would take about 100 pre-positioned locations, extrapolating this information based upon the positioning information from the implosion of the ]. He explained that his conclusions were based solely upon on-the-fly back-of-the-napkin analysis extrapolated from the Kingdome implosion data done during the commercial break. <ref> {{cite news | last = Ross | first = Dave | title = A Conversation with 9/11 Researcher Prof. Steven Jones | publisher = 710 KIRO | date = ]| url = http://www.710kiro.com/getpodcast.aspx?sid=7912&lid=3017&id=255767&source=2&url=http://podcasting.fia.net/3017/1567621.mp3| accessdate = 2006-08-07 }} </ref> | |||
| ===Criticism=== | ===Criticism=== | ||
| Qualified experts have dismissed Jones' paper as being a "non-issue", and containing "nothing to debunk." Since Jones' paper has not been published in a scientific journal, there are academicians, including some from Jones' own university, who question whether the article has been properly vetted by other experts in the field. <ref name="Chronicle"/> | |||
| The BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences issued a statement in which they distanced themselves from Jones' research. A similar statement was issued by BYU's structural engineering faculty. The statements noted that Jones' hypotheses and interpretations of evidence were being questioned by scholars and practitioners, and that his analyses and hypotheses had not been "submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."<ref>{{cite web |last = McIlvain |first = Ryan | year = December 5, 2005 | url = http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724 |title = Censor rumors quelled |accessdate = 2006-07-29}}</ref> |
The BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences has issued a statement in which they distanced themselves from Jones' research. A similar statement was issued by BYU's structural engineering faculty, the "Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology." The statements noted that Jones' hypotheses and interpretations of evidence were being questioned by scholars and practitioners, and that his analyses and hypotheses had not been "''submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review.''" <ref>{{cite web |last = McIlvain |first = Ryan | year = December 5, 2005 | url = http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/57724 |title = Censor rumors quelled |accessdate = 2006-07-29}}</ref> | ||
| D. Allan Firmage, Professor Emeritus, Civil Engineering, BYU<ref>{{cite web |last = |first = | year =| url = http://www.et.byu.edu/ce/people/people.php?person=32 |title = D. Allan Firmage | work = Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering |publisher = Brigham Young University | accessdate = 2006-07-27}}</ref>, |
D. Allan Firmage, Professor Emeritus, Civil Engineering, BYU <ref>{{cite web |last = |first = | year =| url = http://www.et.byu.edu/ce/people/people.php?person=32 |title = D. Allan Firmage | work = Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering |publisher = Brigham Young University | accessdate = 2006-07-27}}</ref>, responded to an article from the ] which detailed a presentation that Steven Jones had recently given, and remarked that after reading reports from ], the ] and from other professional engineering organizations, as well as Jones' paper, he found the thesis that planted explosives (rather than fire from the planes) had caused the collapse of the Towers, "''very unreliable''." Dr. Firmage further added: "''Before one (especially students) supports such a conspiracy theory, they should investigate all details of the theory. To me, a practicing structural engineer of 57 continuous years, Professor Jones' presentations are very disturbing.''"<ref>{{cite web |last = |first = | year = April 9, 2006 | url = http://www.netxnews.net/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/04/09/443801bdadd6e |title = Refuting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory | work = Letter to the Editor |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-07-27}}</ref> | ||
| In August 2006, |
In August 2006, two former members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" who put forth a theory that commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers<ref>{{cite web| last = Reynolds| first = Morgan| authorlink = Morgan Reynolds| coauthors = Judy Wood| title = The Trouble with Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research, No Planes Theory| work =| publisher =| date =| url = http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=trouble_with_jones#NPT| format =| doi =| accessdate = }}</ref>, Judy Woods and Morgan Reynolds, strongly criticized Jones' work within the 9/11 Truth movement, stating: ''"Steven E. Jones, BYU physicist, rocketed to the top of the 9/11 research ladder based on position and credentials. But nearly a year later, his contributions range from irrelevant to redundant to misleading to wrong. He has not turned up a single item of value. The majority of what Jones says is political and his physics is egregiously wrong, deceptive, nonexistent and shallow."''<ref>{{cite web| last = Reynolds| first = Morgan| authorlink = Morgan Reynolds| coauthors = Judy Wood| title = The Trouble with Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research| work =| publisher =| date =| url = http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=trouble_with_jones| format =| doi =| accessdate = }}</ref> Other 9/11 researchers have also criticized the 'no Boeing' theories and have had similar personal attacks or broad claims without academic critique leveled at them <ref></ref> | ||
| ==Affiliations== | ==Affiliations== | ||
| Jones is Co-Chair of ], which according to the organization itself is "a non-partisan association of faculty, students, and scholars, in fields as diverse as history, science, military affairs, psychology, and philosophy, dedicated to exposing falsehoods and to revealing truths behind 9/11."<ref>{{cite web | last = | first = | year = | url = http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/WhoAreWe.html |title = Scholars for 9/11 Truth - Who Are We? | work = |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-08-04}}</ref> Jones is also the editor of the Journal Of 9/11 Studies.<ref>{{cite web | last = | first = | year = | url = http://www.journalof911studies.com/ |title = Journal of 9/11 Studies | work = |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-08-06}}</ref> | Jones is Co-Chair of ], which according to the organization itself is "a non-partisan association of faculty, students, and scholars, in fields as diverse as history, science, military affairs, psychology, and philosophy, dedicated to exposing falsehoods and to revealing truths behind 9/11." <ref>{{cite web | last = | first = | year = | url = http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/WhoAreWe.html |title = Scholars for 9/11 Truth - Who Are We? | work = |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-08-04}}</ref> Jones is also the editor of the Journal Of 9/11 Studies.<ref>{{cite web | last = | first = | year = | url = http://www.journalof911studies.com/ |title = Journal of 9/11 Studies | work = |publisher = | accessdate = 2006-08-06}}</ref> | ||
| Jones is a member of The ]. | Jones is a member of The ]. | ||
| Jones has been described as "a devout Mormon and, until recently, a faithful supporter of George W. Bush."<ref name="Chronicle"/> | Jones has been described as "a devout Mormon and, until recently, a faithful supporter of George W. Bush." <ref name="Chronicle"/> | ||
| ==Recognition and awards== | ==Recognition and awards== | ||
| Line 59: | Line 62: | ||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| Line 71: | Line 77: | ||
| * by Steven E. Jones | * by Steven E. Jones | ||
| * PDF presentation by Steven E. Jones | * PDF presentation by Steven E. Jones | ||
| * ], ], ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 03:41, 6 September 2006
Steven Earl Jones is a professor of physics at Brigham Young University. His research includes nuclear fusion, solar energy, and 9/11 conspiracy theories. He is co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and co-edits the Journal of 9/11 Studies. In the 1980s Jones popularized the term cold fusion, but his experimental work was significantly different from the more controversial cold fusion experiments of Pons and Fleischmann.
Jones is currently investigating the hypothesis that the World Trade Center Twin Towers and WTC 7 were brought down by pre-positioned cutter charges, one of the various conspiracy theories surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Education
In 1973, Jones earned his bachelors degree in physics, magna cum laude, from Brigham Young University, and his Ph.D. in physics from Vanderbilt University in 1978. Jones conducted his Ph.D. research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (from 1974 to 1977), and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility.
Research interests and background
Jones conducted research at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, in Arco, Idaho, from 1979 to 1985, where he was a senior engineering specialist. He was the principal investigator for experimental Muon-catalyzed fusion from 1982 to 1991 for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects. From 1990 to 1993, Jones researched fusion in condensed matter physics and deuterium, for the U.S. Department of Energy and for the Electric Power Research Institute.
Jones has also been a collaborator in several experiments, including experiments at TRIUMF (Vancouver, British Columbia), The National High Energy Laboratory, KEK (Tsukuba, Japan), and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory at Oxford University.
Jones specializes in Metal-catalyzed fusion, Archaeometry and Solar energy .
Jones has written a paper entitled "Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America" in which he used archeological evidence to support the claims of Joseph Smith Jr. (founder of the Latter Day Saint movement) that Jesus had visited the Native Americans after his Resurrection, an event chronicled in the Book of Mormon. The evidence pointed to is Mayan depictions of deities which have stigmata like markings on their hands.
Cold fusion
In the mid-1980s, Jones and other BYU scientists worked on what he then referred to as Cold Nuclear Fusion in a Scientific American article, but is today known as muon-catalyzed fusion to avoid confusion. Muon-catalyzed fusion was a field of some interest in the 1980s, but its low energy output appears to be unavoidable and the field has since fallen from interest.
Around 1985 Jones then became interested in the anomalous production of helium-3 found in the gasses escaping from volcanoes. He hypothesized that the high pressures in the Earth's interior might make fusion more likely, and began a series of experiments on what he referred to as piezofusion, or high-pressure fusion. His experiments initially used a diamond anvil to create high pressures, but he later moved on to an apparatus similar to the one also used by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann. In order to characterize the reactions, Jones designed and built a neutron counter able to accurately measure the tiny numbers of neutrons being produced in his experiments. The counter suggested a small amount of fusion was going on. Jones said the result suggested at least the possibility of fusion, though the process was unlikely to be useful as an energy source.
Pons and Fleischmann (P&F) started their work around the same time. Their work was brought to Jones' attention when they applied for research funding from the Department of Energy and they passed their proposal along to Jones for peer review. Realizing their work was very similar, Jones and P&F agreed to release their papers to Nature on the same day, March 24, 1987. However, P&F announced their results at a press event the day before. Jones faxed his paper to Nature.
A New York Times article says that while peer reviewers were quite critical of Pons and Fleishchmann's research they did not apply such criticism to Jones' much more modest, theoretically supported findings. Although critics insisted that his results likely stemmed from experimental error, most of the reviewing physicists indicated that he was a careful scientist.
WTC collapse hypothesis
Jones has written a paper regarding the September 11, 2001 attacks, entitled "Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?". In his paper, Jones cites what he considers evidence which he believes supports the hypothesis that the World Trade Center was brought down, not by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges and thermite.
Jones has compiled a presentation, "Answers to Objections and Questions," in which he seeks to answer objections and detail certain aspects of his views. With regard to his findings, Jones says they are "compelling to many, but one needs to be cautious until results are checked and published in a peer-reviewed journal." He also says "It is important scientifically to have an independent analyses performed, to verify the presence of thermite signature chemical elements. And to publish results in a peer reviewed journal. Realistically, both groups will probably need to submit simultaneously to be published in a major journal like Nature."
Jones was also a speaker at the "9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda Symposium."
On August 7, 2006, Jones appeared on Dave Ross’s morning radio show on KIRO (AM) in Seattle, Washington. During the broadcast, Jones postulated that it would take approximately 1000 pounds of thermite to take down each of the WTC towers. When Ross asked Jones to describe the possible number and positioning of the charges, Jones consulted the Internet and described on-air that it would take about 100 pre-positioned locations, extrapolating this information based upon the positioning information from the implosion of the Kingdome. He explained that his conclusions were based solely upon on-the-fly back-of-the-napkin analysis extrapolated from the Kingdome implosion data done during the commercial break.
Criticism
Qualified experts have dismissed Jones' paper as being a "non-issue", and containing "nothing to debunk." Since Jones' paper has not been published in a scientific journal, there are academicians, including some from Jones' own university, who question whether the article has been properly vetted by other experts in the field.
The BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences has issued a statement in which they distanced themselves from Jones' research. A similar statement was issued by BYU's structural engineering faculty, the "Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology." The statements noted that Jones' hypotheses and interpretations of evidence were being questioned by scholars and practitioners, and that his analyses and hypotheses had not been "submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."
D. Allan Firmage, Professor Emeritus, Civil Engineering, BYU , responded to an article from the Provo Daily Herald which detailed a presentation that Steven Jones had recently given, and remarked that after reading reports from FEMA, the ASCE and from other professional engineering organizations, as well as Jones' paper, he found the thesis that planted explosives (rather than fire from the planes) had caused the collapse of the Towers, "very unreliable." Dr. Firmage further added: "Before one (especially students) supports such a conspiracy theory, they should investigate all details of the theory. To me, a practicing structural engineer of 57 continuous years, Professor Jones' presentations are very disturbing."
In August 2006, two former members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" who put forth a theory that commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers, Judy Woods and Morgan Reynolds, strongly criticized Jones' work within the 9/11 Truth movement, stating: "Steven E. Jones, BYU physicist, rocketed to the top of the 9/11 research ladder based on position and credentials. But nearly a year later, his contributions range from irrelevant to redundant to misleading to wrong. He has not turned up a single item of value. The majority of what Jones says is political and his physics is egregiously wrong, deceptive, nonexistent and shallow." Other 9/11 researchers have also criticized the 'no Boeing' theories and have had similar personal attacks or broad claims without academic critique leveled at them
Affiliations
Jones is Co-Chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which according to the organization itself is "a non-partisan association of faculty, students, and scholars, in fields as diverse as history, science, military affairs, psychology, and philosophy, dedicated to exposing falsehoods and to revealing truths behind 9/11." Jones is also the editor of the Journal Of 9/11 Studies.
Jones is a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Jones has been described as "a devout Mormon and, until recently, a faithful supporter of George W. Bush."
Recognition and awards
- 1968, David O. McKay Scholarship at BYU; National Merit Scholar
- 1973-1978 Tuition Scholarship and Research Fellowship at Vanderbilt University
- 1989 Outstanding Young Scholar Award (BYU); Best of What's New for 1989 (Popular Science); Creativity Prize (Japanese Creativity Society)
- 1990 BYU Young Scholar Award; Annual Lecturer, BYU Chapter of Sigma Xi
References
- Pope, Justin (2006-08-06). "9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Thriving". ABC News > U.S. ABCNews Internet Ventures. Retrieved 2006-08-21.
- Journal of 9/11 Studies: official site
- "Frequently Asked Questions About The Field of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions". A Subset of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. New Energy Times. Retrieved 2006-07-27.
- Brigham Young University: Steven E. Jones current research
- ^ Gravois, John (June 23, 2006). "Professors of Paranoia? Academics give a scholarly stamp to 9/11 conspiracy theories". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2006-07-27.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link) - Brigham Young University: Steven E. Jones's CV
- "Steven E. Jones' biography at BYU". Retrieved 2006-08-03.
- Jones, Steven E. "Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America". Retrieved 2006-07-27.
- Jones’s manuscript on history of cold fusion at BYU, Ludwik Kowalski, March 5, 2004
- Browne, Malcolm W. (1989). "Physicists Debunk Claim Of a New Kind of Fusion". Science. The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-07-14.
- Jones, Steven E. "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?". Retrieved 2006-07-27.
- Jones, Steven E. (July 18, 2006). "Answers to Objections and Questions" (pdf). Retrieved 2006-08-05.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link) - "9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda" Press Release
- Ross, Dave (2006-08-07). "A Conversation with 9/11 Researcher Prof. Steven Jones". 710 KIRO. Retrieved 2006-08-07.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - McIlvain, Ryan (December 5, 2005). "Censor rumors quelled". Retrieved 2006-07-29.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link) - "D. Allan Firmage". Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Brigham Young University. Retrieved 2006-07-27.
- "Refuting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory". Letter to the Editor. April 9, 2006. Retrieved 2006-07-27.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link) - Reynolds, Morgan. "The Trouble with Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research, No Planes Theory".
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - Reynolds, Morgan. "The Trouble with Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research".
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - "Scholars for 9/11 Truth - Who Are We?". Retrieved 2006-08-04.
- "Journal of 9/11 Studies". Retrieved 2006-08-06.
- Brigham Young University: Steven E. Jones's CV
- Gravois, John (2006). "A theory that just won't die". News. CanWest Interactive. Retrieved 2006-08-21.
See also
- Collapse of the World Trade Center
- Researchers questioning the official account of 9/11
- 9/11 Truth Movement
- David Ray Griffin
- Jim Hoffman
External links
- BYU energy research, Bio on Steven E. Jones
- Brookings.com - 'Cold Fusion'
- Works by Steven E. Jones at Project Gutenberg
- Project Gutenberg - 'The BYU Solar Cooker/Cooler'
Links covering Professor Jones' 9/11 research
- 'Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?' by Steven E. Jones
- 'Answers to Objections and Questions' PDF presentation by Steven E. Jones