Revision as of 01:09, 28 September 2016 editFeminist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers157,837 edits →Requested move 22 September 2016← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:31, 29 September 2016 edit undo71.191.205.5 (talk) →Requested move 22 September 2016Next edit → | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
That article doesn't seem to be notable as this one, plus that network's owner doesn't have its own page. ] (]) 22:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC) | That article doesn't seem to be notable as this one, plus that network's owner doesn't have its own page. ] (]) 22:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
*'''Support''' on the condition that ] is deleted. I would recommend keeping this RM open until the AfD for the Congolese company is closed. ]] 01:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | *'''Support''' on the condition that ] is deleted. I would recommend keeping this RM open until the AfD for the Congolese company is closed. ]] 01:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
*'''Comment''' – The Supercell mobile-phone network owner is probably notable. I think that ] should be a partial disambiguation page or, in the alternative, leave it the way that it is and just adjust all the incoming links. ] (]) 19:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:31, 29 September 2016
Companies Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Boom Beach
No independent notability DGG ( talk ) 07:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- A Google News search comes up with a lot of coverage for this recently released game. It seems notable to me. Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Their other flagship game "Clash of Clans" has its own page too. Why merge Boom Beach and not this other one? --70.83.240.49 (talk) 21:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- I agree. Both "Clash of Clans" and "Hey Day" should be in the same category. Tris1313 (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2014 (UTC) yje games are different and save each page of there own as do the super cell pages
- No, Boom Beach has notability now. Benthatsme (talk) 19:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
No, Boom Beach and Supercell are not the same thing. Why merge them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.68.128.114 (talk) 00:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Proposed Categorisation as a Stub
Removed due to inappropriate comments. Mfribbs 23:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2016
This edit request to Supercell (video game company) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It says "it was a immediate popularity" which is not grammatically correct. It should say "it was immediately popular" or something along those lines. Qndarwin (talk) 00:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Removing Opinion Content
The section added on January 30 2016 concerning the Clash of Clans update contains a lot of unsubstantiated statements such as "Although many players quit, Supercell has done little to improve the gameplay since this update." and "Many players in the clash community have dubbed this update "the death of clash" as well as "the power of greed". The only source given is an opinion piece on a tech blog. Overall, I'm not sure what any of these edits have to do with the company and question their place on this page. 198.84.189.187 (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 22 September 2016
The request to rename this article to Supercell (company) has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Supercell (video game company) → Supercell (company) – There doesn't seem to be any other company named Supercell other than this one. Paul Badillo (talk) 00:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- There is Supercell (mobile network), which states that it is owned by Supercell SPRL, but not sure if that means it should or shouldn't be changed. soetermans. 09:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
That article doesn't seem to be notable as this one, plus that network's owner doesn't have its own page. Paul Badillo (talk) 22:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support on the condition that Supercell (mobile network) is deleted. I would recommend keeping this RM open until the AfD for the Congolese company is closed. SSTflyer 01:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – The Supercell mobile-phone network owner is probably notable. I think that Supercell (company) should be a partial disambiguation page or, in the alternative, leave it the way that it is and just adjust all the incoming links. 71.191.205.5 (talk) 19:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)