| Revision as of 22:45, 7 September 2006 editSango123 (talk | contribs)26,665 edits →Re: Thanks: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:58, 7 September 2006 edit undoBhadani (talk | contribs)204,742 edits →Priyanka Chopra: messing around - People would always mess around with pretty women! Ultimately, this will be over and a "lasting relationship" shall emergeNext edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| Hello, Bhadani, | Hello, Bhadani, | ||
| there has been a small problem over at ]`s page: if you click her picture in the box (this one:), scroll down a bit and look out for the history of that picture, you notice, that two users (Prettywoman) who possibly the same person have been messing around with the picture. I tried to talk to them but to no avail - the user keeps adding the same copyright violating picture. Could you have a look? --] <sup>]</sup> 01:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC) | there has been a small problem over at ]`s page: if you click her picture in the box (this one:), scroll down a bit and look out for the history of that picture, you notice, that two users (Prettywoman) who possibly the same person have been messing around with the picture. I tried to talk to them but to no avail - the user keeps adding the same copyright violating picture. Could you have a look? --] <sup>]</sup> 01:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : --] 22:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == I need help with a personal attack against me == | == I need help with a personal attack against me == | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 7 September 2006
With Malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up theYou can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The whole problem with
MeetingThanks. Await anxiously. --Dore chakravarty 02:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC) BarnstarMoved - a message of 2nd September 2006 DeletionCould you tell me how to delete a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varda (talk • contribs) of 02.09.06 Priyanka ChopraHello, Bhadani, there has been a small problem over at Priyanka Chopra`s page: if you click her picture in the box (this one:), scroll down a bit and look out for the history of that picture, you notice, that two users (Prettywoman) who possibly the same person have been messing around with the picture. I tried to talk to them but to no avail - the user keeps adding the same copyright violating picture. Could you have a look? --Plumcouch 01:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
I need help with a personal attack against meUser:SqueakBox doesn't like me. He has insulted me in the past and, recently, he was blocked for posting the following insult in his user page: "My greatest achievements here have been and restoring José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero from the POV of another user who claims to write about saints." (See the entry for August 21 in his block log) My nick, Hagiographer means just that, "to write about saints", so it's clear that comment is a direct attack against me. Furthermore, when I came to the article about Zapatero SqueakBox had already been banned from editing Zapatero's editing articles by the Arbitraton Committee (what can he restore?). And, in fact, I've never contributed or deleted information from any of those articles. I simply reverted some vandalism SqueakBox introduced as part of his harassment campaing against other user who was also banned by the same Arbitration Comittee decision. So, that paragraph is pure slander. Taking WP:NPA into account, I believe that paragraph should be deleted or, at least, marked like what it is, a personal attack. I did just that . However, SqueakBox removed it and User:Guettarda protected the page here. SqueakBox has had a lot of problems with other users and, sometimes, Guettarda has taken part in them. For example, in User:SqueakBox can be found a barnstar given by User:Guettarda in which he says that SqueakBox has gone beyond the call of duty in his fight against "strange" people in the article Javier Solana. WP:NPA states clearly that comments must be about content not users so it's clear that Guettarda and SqueakBox have cooperated in, at least, dubious actions against other users. It's also clear Guettarda is biased in favor of SqueakBox. In this edit in my talk page, he implies that I like looking for conflict, that I'm obsessed with SqueakBox that I've to settle down and so on, all violation of WP:AGF and unpleasant remarks. It mustn't be forgotten that according to WP:OWN, user pages belong to everybody and I don't believe a wikipedian has any right to transform his user page in a platform to attack other users. So Guettarda's supposed protection of SqueakBox's user page (really of SqueakBox's insults) is very difficult to defend in my opinion. I'm simply asking fair treatment. I don't believe I have to see how the Misplaced Pages is populated with insults against me. I believe SqueakBox can contribute useful edits without transforming his user page into a gallery of attacks. So please, either unprotect the page so WP:OWN can be applied, or remove the negative comment or mark it as a personal attack untolerable in the Misplaced Pages or, at least, explain to me why I have to bear that kind of treatment. SqueakBox has been blocked for that unpleasant remark, What is the use of blocking him and then keeping the insult? Thank you. Hagiographer 08:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Help with LimerenceNoting your post on Limerence article talk page, I have to ask why you thought it needed...more? Just looking at the article...I really believe we have a shocker of self-promotional garbage here. Everyone seems content with leaving the noncompliant markup up the top of the page and yakking about it in the talk page. Shrugs. What do you think? Australian Matt 14:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC) How do I deal with this?http://en.wikipedia.org/Path-goal_model This seems to be copied EXACTLY from here http://telecollege.dcccd.edu/mgmt1374/book_contents/4directing/leading/lead.htm, and thats a copyrighted site.... What're the policies on this? Alex Thomas 20:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)AlexThomas
JPD's RfAThanks, Bhadani, for your intended support at my RfA. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown in me in my activities as an administrator. JPD (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks for clarifyingKaur just led me to the assumption. Thanks for the sources.Bakaman Bakatalk 00:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
MeetingThanks very much. Happy. --Dore chakravarty 02:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Re: ThanksYou're always welcome, Bhadani! That's great that you'll be sticking around here, Misplaced Pages is better for it. :) -- Natalya 03:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 
Re Anonymous editorHi Bhadani, No, I didn't when I left my note, but I see you've been asking after him for a while; I appreciate your concern. I guess you've tried sending him an email... Do you know of (or perhaps there might be indications that) another user has met or knows him personally...? (I guess you've pursued this also...) At present, I can't think what else might be done... perhaps some clue on another wiki (the Commons?) or from an internet search linking "Anonymous editor" and "wiki*"...? I'll let you know if another possibility occurs to me. Hopefully, David Kernow 15:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
