| Revision as of 19:03, 14 September 2006 editGunnar Larsson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,475 edits Ambiguous sentence← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:42, 15 September 2006 edit undoEveryking (talk | contribs)155,603 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| If it is singly ionized nitrogen; does it have to be mentioned at all? In such case it is already mentioned in the text that green represents singly ionized nitrogen. ] 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC) | If it is singly ionized nitrogen; does it have to be mentioned at all? In such case it is already mentioned in the text that green represents singly ionized nitrogen. ] 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Detail== | |||
| Please note , in which Worldtraveller removes detail, as he is inclined to do simply as a matter of philosophy (read his user page). I propose that if the detail is referenced it should be restored. ] 09:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:42, 15 September 2006
Template:Featured article is only for Misplaced Pages:Featured articles. Template:Mainpage date Template:V0.5
Ambiguous sentence
From the article:
- The image reveals two 'caps' of less ionised material at the edge of the nebula
Should it be read as that the material in these regions are less ionised compared to other regions; or that the concentration of ionised particles is lower, or something else?
If it is singly ionized nitrogen; does it have to be mentioned at all? In such case it is already mentioned in the text that green represents singly ionized nitrogen. Gunnar Larsson 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Detail
Please note this edit, in which Worldtraveller removes detail, as he is inclined to do simply as a matter of philosophy (read his user page). I propose that if the detail is referenced it should be restored. Everyking 09:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)