Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Age of Empires III military units: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:02, 16 September 2006 editMER-C (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators250,708 edits delete← Previous edit Revision as of 09:17, 16 September 2006 edit undoCk lostsword (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,455 edits Transwiki?Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
Misplaced Pages is not a game guide. This page provides a list of all the units in Age of Empires III and gives information on which units are effective against other units. This makes it a clear violation of ]. Was successfully prodded at some point but was recreated recently. ] 05:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Misplaced Pages is not a game guide. This page provides a list of all the units in Age of Empires III and gives information on which units are effective against other units. This makes it a clear violation of ]. Was successfully prodded at some point but was recreated recently. ] 05:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Transwiki''' is one of the gaming wikis wants it, else '''delete''' per nom. ] 08:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC) *'''Transwiki''' if one of the gaming wikis wants it, else '''delete''' per nom. ] 08:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Transwiki''', possibly to , or another similar. ]<font color="green">]</font>]<font color="green">]</font>]|<sup>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub> 09:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:17, 16 September 2006

Age of Empires III military units

Misplaced Pages is not a game guide. This page provides a list of all the units in Age of Empires III and gives information on which units are effective against other units. This makes it a clear violation of WP:NOT. Was successfully prodded at some point but was recreated recently. Indrian 05:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)