Revision as of 00:58, 17 September 2006 edit203.206.26.160 (talk) a little over zealous← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:25, 17 September 2006 edit undoBhadani (talk | contribs)204,742 edits →a little over zealous: my response - be bold not recklessNext edit → | ||
Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
It wasn't vandalism - Misplaced Pages says be bold - I am a new user and meant to press sandbox Misplaced Pages says give new users a chance dude - so thank you but unecessary if you waited four seconds i changed it and went back to sandbox. Undestand that even though it is a polemic issue does not give you a right to issue a final warning vandalism note. Thanks!(Smiles and kisses)] 00:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Eloise | It wasn't vandalism - Misplaced Pages says be bold - I am a new user and meant to press sandbox Misplaced Pages says give new users a chance dude - so thank you but unecessary if you waited four seconds i changed it and went back to sandbox. Undestand that even though it is a polemic issue does not give you a right to issue a final warning vandalism note. Thanks!(Smiles and kisses)] 00:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Eloise | ||
:''Copied from that IP's page'': I understand your concern: . I was not over zealous, but acting in response to an edit by you. Yes, wikipedia says '''Be Bold''', but it also says '''do not be reckless'''. Moreover, it also says '''follow no rule''' which I was obliged to follow as your edit looked like vandalism, as you had changed the page name. Your knowledge of processes and procedures of wikipedia indicate that you are not very new to wikipedia: please register a user name if you do not have any, unless you want to land yourself in difficulties as you just faced. The warning shall continue to warn any other users who may be editing from this IP address anonymously. Cheers. (Smiles and kisses) and hugs too. --] 01:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:25, 17 September 2006
With Malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up theYou can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The whole problem with
BarnstarMoved - a message of 2nd September 2006 DeletionCould you tell me how to delete a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varda (talk • contribs) of 02.09.06 Priyanka ChopraHello, Bhadani, there has been a small problem over at Priyanka Chopra`s page: if you click her picture in the box (this one:), scroll down a bit and look out for the history of that picture, you notice, that two users (Prettywoman) who possibly the same person have been messing around with the picture. I tried to talk to them but to no avail - the user keeps adding the same copyright violating picture. Could you have a look? --Plumcouch 01:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
I need help with a personal attack against meUser:SqueakBox doesn't like me. He has insulted me in the past and, recently, he was blocked for posting the following insult in his user page: "My greatest achievements here have been and restoring José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero from the POV of another user who claims to write about saints." (See the entry for August 21 in his block log) My nick, Hagiographer means just that, "to write about saints", so it's clear that comment is a direct attack against me. Furthermore, when I came to the article about Zapatero SqueakBox had already been banned from editing Zapatero's editing articles by the Arbitraton Committee (what can he restore?). And, in fact, I've never contributed or deleted information from any of those articles. I simply reverted some vandalism SqueakBox introduced as part of his harassment campaing against other user who was also banned by the same Arbitration Comittee decision. So, that paragraph is pure slander. Taking WP:NPA into account, I believe that paragraph should be deleted or, at least, marked like what it is, a personal attack. I did just that . However, SqueakBox removed it and User:Guettarda protected the page here. SqueakBox has had a lot of problems with other users and, sometimes, Guettarda has taken part in them. For example, in User:SqueakBox can be found a barnstar given by User:Guettarda in which he says that SqueakBox has gone beyond the call of duty in his fight against "strange" people in the article Javier Solana. WP:NPA states clearly that comments must be about content not users so it's clear that Guettarda and SqueakBox have cooperated in, at least, dubious actions against other users. It's also clear Guettarda is biased in favor of SqueakBox. In this edit in my talk page, he implies that I like looking for conflict, that I'm obsessed with SqueakBox that I've to settle down and so on, all violation of WP:AGF and unpleasant remarks. It mustn't be forgotten that according to WP:OWN, user pages belong to everybody and I don't believe a wikipedian has any right to transform his user page in a platform to attack other users. So Guettarda's supposed protection of SqueakBox's user page (really of SqueakBox's insults) is very difficult to defend in my opinion. I'm simply asking fair treatment. I don't believe I have to see how the Misplaced Pages is populated with insults against me. I believe SqueakBox can contribute useful edits without transforming his user page into a gallery of attacks. So please, either unprotect the page so WP:OWN can be applied, or remove the negative comment or mark it as a personal attack untolerable in the Misplaced Pages or, at least, explain to me why I have to bear that kind of treatment. SqueakBox has been blocked for that unpleasant remark, What is the use of blocking him and then keeping the insult? Thank you. Hagiographer 08:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Help with LimerenceNoting your post on Limerence article talk page, I have to ask why you thought it needed...more? Just looking at the article...I really believe we have a shocker of self-promotional garbage here. Everyone seems content with leaving the noncompliant markup up the top of the page and yakking about it in the talk page. Shrugs. What do you think? Australian Matt 14:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
How do I deal with this?http://en.wikipedia.org/Path-goal_model This seems to be copied EXACTLY from here http://telecollege.dcccd.edu/mgmt1374/book_contents/4directing/leading/lead.htm, and thats a copyrighted site.... What're the policies on this? Alex Thomas 20:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)AlexThomas
JPD's RfAThanks, Bhadani, for your intended support at my RfA. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown in me in my activities as an administrator. JPD (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks for clarifyingKaur just led me to the assumption. Thanks for the sources.Bakaman Bakatalk 00:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
MeetingThanks very much. Happy. --Dore chakravarty 02:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Re: ThanksYou're always welcome, Bhadani! That's great that you'll be sticking around here, Misplaced Pages is better for it. :) -- Natalya 03:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Re Anonymous editorHi Bhadani, No, I didn't when I left my note, but I see you've been asking after him for a while; I appreciate your concern. I guess you've tried sending him an email... Do you know of (or perhaps there might be indications that) another user has met or knows him personally...? (I guess you've pursued this also...) At present, I can't think what else might be done... perhaps some clue on another wiki (the Commons?) or from an internet search linking "Anonymous editor" and "wiki*"...? I'll let you know if another possibility occurs to me. Hopefully, David Kernow 15:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for the birthday wishes :) Viridae 00:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC) SudamaThanks, Bhadani for the comments. Raj2004 00:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Trollish behaviourWhy, because TheOuthouseMouse is just stirring shit over at Talk:Global warming. People with no intention to contribute encylopedic content are harmful, and drive away valuable contributors. I've seen it happen on several occasions. While we need to keep the encyclopedia as open as possible, this place shouldn't be allowed to become a sewer filled with rubbish. I don't care if you block me - trolling is about intent as much as anything - I stand by my comments. 125.237.74.41 01:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank youThanks for your kind words. It's great to see that some people over here are so well intentioned. Thanks. Hagiographer 06:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC) HelloHello Bhadaniji, thank you for the encouraging words... Seeing you after a long time. The Indian presence seems to have reduced in the past few days. Many old timers are rarely seen. But Samir, Aksi, Dwaipayanc, Ambuj etc are still quite active. How is everything with you? -- Lost 14:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello again Bhadaniji, I tried searching for diffs but it is a very long page. But the easier way to do it is, just go to WT:RFA and search for his name using the find function. You will find it twice and you can go through the appropriate comments. Hope this helps -- Lost 03:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC) Hi Bhadaniji!Hello Bhadaniji, did you see this? btw, you have to ask the next question on WP:PINQ. --Gurubrahma 10:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC) Re: DYKThank you. You may also like this article created by me 2 days ago. It is also in queue for DYK. - Aksi_great (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
HelloHello Bhadaniji. I wish I could get up early. I'm on the other side of the world right now, and it's hard to get up before 8. You get up quite early, though! Here's a mantra on the morning. I know it by heart for a decade, but am yet to find out the exact meaning!
ThanksFor helping a brother out on the CfD. Contrary to what Zora says, I don't find the need to "communalize" wikipedia, I merely want Hindus represented on wiki, as we are 1/6 of the world. Also I created the Muslim cat, not for "perpetrating massacre" but to make a precedent that would strike down all religions, before singling out "Hindu" cats. I now know I should have started with Sikh or Jewish so that it would have been less "controversial" and more "secular", because a Hindu user creating both Hindu and Muslim cats is "communalizing Misplaced Pages". I dont really want to talk to Zora anymore, (she called me some nice names on another AfD), so please consider this a "factual response" to the "hate attack" on Bakaman. Bakaman Bakatalk 00:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Need helpDear Bhadani, can you please check the new article I've made: Chaunk? Badagnani 02:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC) I'm so glad you remembered about AIR! The question is, are they not able to find anything or are they not *interested* in helping you to find something. Oh, well, I am much obliged and happy to help you if you ever need some similar information from the U.S. Is it true that chaunk is pronounced "chawnce" or is this just in the Bengali language? Badagnani 02:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC) ProtectedSorry Bhadaniji, there was a bit of vandalism and I protected your user page and sprotected your talk page. Hope its okay. Take care -- Samir धर्म 13:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
HelloHello sir, How are you? I still remember you told that you might be shifting to Kolkata for proffesional reasons. What about that? :)--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
PINQDear Bhadaniji, thanks for your warm words. It is your support, encouragement and example that keep me going. Thanks again, --Gurubrahma 14:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC) Wild AssHello Bhadaniji. Since you liked my last DYK - do read Wild Ass Wildlife Sanctuary. Also, take a look at Portal:Gujarat and tell me how you like it. - Aksi_great (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Use of profanic wordsThis is to bring your attention to vandalism, Somebody is using your name to defame many other names. --Ninad 12:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Little TerroristHello Bhadaniji, thank you:)... When I just started writing the article, I wrote one line and somebody deleted it. I really felt like a Little Terrorist;). But all cleared now and it is even up for DYK!! -- Lost 12:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC) User NameHi there, Thanx for yor message, but how come my name's not conforming to policy. Please sir, can yo elaborate ? --Arya Rajya Maharashtra 13:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Dear Bhadaniji, Thank you, very much for your concern. Actually, my first name is Arya. And I wanted to put the name of my state in my username. I did toy with the idea of "Arya, Maharashtra Rajya" and "Arya, Maharashtra" but I thought "Arya Rajya Maharashtra" is more rhythmic. I am extremely proud to be a Maharashtrian. I am actually a Maratha and I did thought about putting that in the username as well, but again I thought that would unnecessarily brand me a casteist. So, I thought of the current username. Anyways, the username I used is also "Arya" (Sanskrit word meaning "Noble") as opposed to "Aryan" (Anglicized word). So, ideally there should not be any confusion. Of course, if people find it offensive, is there any way to change my username ? And if they mistakenly block me, will I get unblocked again ? As of now, I guess this current one will do. Thanks, again. Do reply me, sir. --Arya Rajya Maharashtra 14:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Thank you!It is indeed an honour to receive a barnstar from you, Bhadaniji. It made my day. Thank you so much.-- thunderboltz 16:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)a little over zealousIt wasn't vandalism - Misplaced Pages says be bold - I am a new user and meant to press sandbox Misplaced Pages says give new users a chance dude - so thank you but unecessary if you waited four seconds i changed it and went back to sandbox. Undestand that even though it is a polemic issue does not give you a right to issue a final warning vandalism note. Thanks!(Smiles and kisses)203.206.26.160 00:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Eloise
|