Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:57, 13 October 2006

India Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Title

I think the title should be as per Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions. →Talk 18:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

POV

Please try and restrict the POV in the investigations section. There's a lot of selective quoting happening there. Hornplease 19:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC) Also, I am not reverting again, but will do so tomorrow: the arrests are the most important part of the investigation section! HKelkar, please stop attempting to bury them at the bottom, because very shortly I will have to stop assuming good faith here. Your edits insisting that the forensic report came before cannot justify, at the very least, putting the past history of Malegaon aead of the arrests. Unless you reply with good reasons, I will revert again tomorrow. Hornplease 23:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

You have declared that you will violate wikipedia rules and you have little regard for them. I thank you for your honesty at least.Hkelkar 00:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Furthermore, you are slanting bias into the article by lopsiding the sequence of events.I will put an NPOV tag on this section.Hkelkar 00:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Eh? I have not declared that I will violate the rules! I am trying hard not to. I gave you an opportunity to make your case, while leaving it in your preferred version! How is that a violation? Instead of putting an NPOV tag on it, try and work it out here. I dont want the sequence 'lopsided', I just think that the analysis of the investigation should follow the actual action taken. Hornplease 00:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I dont believe Hkelkar needs to listen to someone who has declared hostilities already.Bakaman _Bakatalk 00:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for that input. How precisely have I 'declared hostilities' when I clearly ask for a reply with good reasons? Hornplease 07:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Hornplease you have unilaterally removed a completely legitimate report published by a notable journalist.There is ample precedent for putting columnist opinions (provided they are stated as such) on wikipedia so They should be put back.Hkelkar 09:50, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

The choice of a particular line, out of a long article, by a particular columnist, out of many hundreds, known elsewhere to be sympathetic to a certain POV is deeply disturbing, and your defense of it meretricious. Further, you have provided no reason for rolling back my other edits. I urge you again to attempt to edit this encyclopaedia in the spirit of WP:NPOV. Anything edited not in that spirit will not stand. Hornplease 22:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Funny how Hornplease doesnt say the same thing about Marxist columnists on Godhra Train Burning. Its ok Hkelkar, the facts have shown it wasn't the Bajrang Dal or any Hindu groups so keep the columnists out I guess.Bakaman _Bakatalk 22:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually, it was the gujarat articles, which i have now taken off my watchlist and dont even think about because they got so pointless, that convinced me that its best to avoid statements from columnists and anyone except those directly involved. Hornplease 05:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

• Unassessed India articles
• Unknown-importance India articles
• Unassessed-Class India articles of Unknown-importance
• WikiProject India articles