Revision as of 15:19, 18 September 2006 editLeibniz (talk | contribs)2,377 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:47, 18 September 2006 edit undoAis523 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,378 edits +previous AfDsNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*'''Delete''' derivative nn cruft. Once you have seen ] (which is cool), you have seen all of these "languages". ] 15:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' derivative nn cruft. Once you have seen ] (which is cool), you have seen all of these "languages". ] 15:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Comment''' There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be. | |||
{| class="messagebox plainlinks" style="text-align:left; width:100%;" | |||
|style=""| ] | |||
|style="padding-left:.2em;"|''Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.'' | |||
Previous ]-related ]: | |||
*'''No result''' ] | |||
*'''Keep''' | |||
*'''Delete''' ] | |||
*'''Delete 1, keep 2''' ] | |||
*'''No result''' ] | |||
*'''No consensus''' ] | |||
*'''Delete most''' ] | |||
*'''Overturn and relist''' | |||
|} | |||
:--] 15:47, 18 September 2006 (]]]) |
Revision as of 15:47, 18 September 2006
2L programming language
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete derivative nn cruft. Once you have seen P′′ (which is cool), you have seen all of these "languages". Leibniz 15:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|