| Revision as of 17:03, 19 September 2006 editHahnchen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,014 edits →[]: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:05, 19 September 2006 edit undoHahnchen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,014 edits →[]: dNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| * '''Redirect''' Already merged. --] 11:44, 19 September 2006 (]]]) | * '''Redirect''' Already merged. --] 11:44, 19 September 2006 (]]]) | ||
| **'''Comment''' - What the fuck has it been merged to, can someone actually explain their votes? And if it is already merged, why then, is Kappa voting Speedy Keep? Has something been merged here? What is Ais523 suggesting we redirect to? - ]]] 17:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | **'''Comment''' - What the fuck has it been merged to, can someone actually explain their votes? And if it is already merged, why then, is Kappa voting Speedy Keep? Has something been merged here? What is Ais523 suggesting we redirect to? - ]]] 17:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Anything of worth is covered in Brainfuck. No assertion of anything. Speedy Keep is the stupidest vote I've seen. - ]]] 17:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:05, 19 September 2006
2L programming language
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete derivative nn cruft. Once you have seen P′′ (which is cool), you have seen all of these "languages". Leibniz 15:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, no demonstrated notability.--Isotope23 20:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.
|
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
- Delete - already merged whilst the concept of overloading by direction is interesting, it's technically nothing new, and not something that new works would be based upon. Lack of verification is an issue. LinaMishima 02:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, already merged. Kappa 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect Already merged. --ais523 11:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - What the fuck has it been merged to, can someone actually explain their votes? And if it is already merged, why then, is Kappa voting Speedy Keep? Has something been merged here? What is Ais523 suggesting we redirect to? - Hahnchen 17:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Anything of worth is covered in Brainfuck. No assertion of anything. Speedy Keep is the stupidest vote I've seen. - Hahnchen 17:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)