| Revision as of 19:08, 19 September 2006 editComicist (talk | contribs)8,155 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:14, 20 September 2006 edit undoSatori Son (talk | contribs)Administrators23,260 editsm AfD category sorting.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD| |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} | ||
| Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets ]. ] 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets ]. ] 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:14, 20 September 2006
Wolfchild (band)
Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets WP:MUSIC. MER-C 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
So what should be done to the article, then? The appearance is good now, but I take it that the band is not good enough :) ? Well it's quite true that the band is not Metallica-big-and-famous, but it's done a quite notable career to their first album and recording deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimtuomi (talk • contribs)
- Delete per WP:NMG. PJM 11:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, maybe the band is good but they don't seem popular enough yet for an article. Read WP:MUSIC. Recury 13:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. --Nishkid64 21:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The band looks like it might pass "Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers, personal blogs, etc...). " If it doesn't, recreate the article when you can prove that it does. Kappa 07:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Wryspy 19:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)