Misplaced Pages

Talk:Bloed, Bodem, Eer en Trouw: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:19, 19 September 2006 editIntangible (talk | contribs)7,421 edits reply← Previous edit Revision as of 20:31, 19 September 2006 edit undoLucVerhelst (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,379 edits ReallyNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
:Griffin isn't used as a source here. --] 18:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC) :Griffin isn't used as a source here. --] 18:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
::He is. That la Libre (incorrectly) reprints his statements, does not make this less a primary source. ] 20:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC) ::He is. That la Libre (incorrectly) reprints his statements, does not make this less a primary source. ] 20:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
:::Griffin's quote isn't used for the information in it, but because of the act of saying that he feels close to the Vlaams Belang. Not the information in his quote is relevant, but the act itself. Surely you can see that.
:::That's why he isn't used as a source here.--] 20:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:31, 19 September 2006

Griffin is not a neutral source. I am not even sure what the reason is for his comment to be entered here. If you are going make an implication, you have to use a reputable and neutral 3rd party source, otherwise it cannot be entered into Misplaced Pages. Intangible 15:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Griffin isn't used as a source here. --LucVerhelst 18:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
He is. That la Libre (incorrectly) reprints his statements, does not make this less a primary source. Intangible 20:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Griffin's quote isn't used for the information in it, but because of the act of saying that he feels close to the Vlaams Belang. Not the information in his quote is relevant, but the act itself. Surely you can see that.
That's why he isn't used as a source here.--LucVerhelst 20:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)