| Revision as of 21:41, 19 September 2006 editSmjg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,861 edits →[]: pardon?← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:17, 22 September 2006 edit undoGay Cdn (talk | contribs)38,969 edits CATNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}} | ||
| This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV . It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. ] 14:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV . It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. ] 14:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be. | *'''Comment''' There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be. | ||
Revision as of 15:17, 22 September 2006
ALPACA programming language
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.
- Delete, no demonstrated notability.--Isotope23 20:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable for being one of relatively few computer languages dedicated to cellular automata, let alone CA languages that are as powerful as this. Indeed, the article doesn't do ALPACA justice - we should expand it to give a much wider view of ALPACA's features, and link to it from the cellular automaton page. I can imagine people coming to it looking for languages used to specify the things. -- Smjg 21:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
|
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
- Delete Already merged, and a lack of apparent references prevents proper verification. As much as it's novel and interesting, it's nature means it's an end-tool rather than something future works build upon. LinaMishima 02:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, already merged. Kappa 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect, already merged. --ais523 11:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- ??? Already merged with what? -- Smjg 21:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)