Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Park City Center: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:05, 20 September 2006 editKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits []: *{{subst:delsort|Malls}} <small>-- ~~~~</small>← Previous edit Revision as of 18:47, 20 September 2006 edit undoForbiddenWord (talk | contribs)716 edits keepNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
* *
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 04:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)</small> *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 04:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)</small>
*'''KEEP''' and do not merge, all retail stores in Lancaster, Pennsylvania are notable and deserve articles. --] 18:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:47, 20 September 2006

Park City Center

Non-notable shopping mall that isn't even really a mall: it's a shopping center that is only partially enclosed. (Here's a pic.) Its only claim to fame seems to be that it's the "largest enclosed shopping center in south-central Pennsylvania". I repeat, south-central Pennsylvania. wikipediatrix 21:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep South-central Pennsylvania's got a million people in its own right. Even if it didn't, at over a million square feet, it's still large enough to warrant notability. Nearly every recent mall AFD has closed as keep or no consensus. Kirjtc2 23:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
This seems more of a shopping center to me. And I've seen several mall AfDs end in deletion.
Misplaced Pages is WP:NOT a directory of retail outlets. Do you consider all retail outlets in south-central Pennsylvania notable for Misplaced Pages, then? Why? wikipediatrix 01:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Normally, I'd assume that Kappa's comment was a joke, but then, it's Kappa making it. Why in God's name would this be a good idea? --Calton | Talk 02:31, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
All verifiable malls are notable enough to be considered part of the sum of human knowledge and to deserve an encylopedic treatment. I will substitute "outlets" with "activity" since I'm not so bothered about corner shops and 7-11s. Kappa 02:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Categories: