| Revision as of 14:42, 20 September 2006 editSeabhcan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,216 edits →[]: close please← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:04, 20 September 2006 edit undoYomangani (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,886 edits →[]: closedNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| You previously started an ] for this article, which is now orphaned. Shall I close it or do you wish to relist it? ]] 14:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | You previously started an ] for this article, which is now orphaned. Shall I close it or do you wish to relist it? ]] 14:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :No go ahead and close it. Thanks. ] 14:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | :No go ahead and close it. Thanks. ] 14:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Done. Cheers, ]] 15:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:04, 20 September 2006
- For older discussions see User talk:Seabhcan/archive01, User talk:Seabhcan/archive02 or User talk:Seabhcan/archive03
State terrorism deletion
Hi, sorry I haven't responded to your question in that AfD, I just don't really have time (I'm at work). I'll get to it; I don't you to think I'm ignoring you. If the AfDcloses and I haven't replied, you caan strike-out my vote. Karwynn (talk) 17:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- No worries. What ever happens with the AfD, I'd still be interested in your reply. Self-Described Seabhcán 17:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Allegations of state terrorism by United States of America
Why did you edit the article after it was protected? Torturous Devastating Cudgel 16:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- It is permitted to correct errors after consultation on the talk page. Self-Described Seabhcán 16:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- It was not an "error", it was a content dispute, as the talk page spells out. And I do not believe it is ever acceptable for an editor involved in an article to edit the article after it has been protected. I would ask you to self revert until the discussion is concluded. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 17:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
(Moved back to article talk)Self-Described Seabhcán 21:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I attempted to email you, but you don't have an email active. Please let me know how I can contact you. Travb (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
rootology arbitration
FYI, rootology arbitration is ongoing: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/MONGO/Workshop "Hey, Bob User:Seabhcan, could you tell me what you think about this discussion? I think your input could help". Now for the disclaimer:
PLEASE NOTE: Users who have a problem with me messaging other users about this case. It is NOT against wikipedia policy to do such things, see: Misplaced Pages:Straw_polls#Survey_etiquette. I have other cases which I can quote. Admin cases. Travb (talk) 18:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Holy crap! thats a long article. Sorry - I won't have time to look at it till next week. Thanks for the heads up, though. Self-Described Seabhcán 18:27, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
REquest for quick page delete
Hi Seabhcan, I've apparently botched a detail in a split. This page will not be missed:Controlled demolition hypothesis for the Collapse of the World Trade Center and if you can just remove it, it may avoid confusion.--Thomas Basboll 13:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Someone made it a redirect to the correct title. That is probably the best solution. Self-Described Seabhcán 13:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
The Institute of Living
You previously started an AFD for this article, which is now orphaned. Shall I close it or do you wish to relist it? Yomangani 14:35, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- No go ahead and close it. Thanks. Self-Described Seabhcán 14:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Cheers, Yomangani 15:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)