| Revision as of 18:14, 20 September 2006 editSatori Son (talk | contribs)Administrators23,260 editsm AfD category sorting.← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:12, 26 September 2006 edit undoMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,575 edits Closing debate; result was deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. - ]''']'''] 04:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} | |||
| Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets ]. ] 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets ]. ] 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 17: | ||
| *Comment: The band looks like it might pass "Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers, personal blogs, etc...). " If it doesn't, recreate the article when you can prove that it does. ] 07:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | *Comment: The band looks like it might pass "Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers, personal blogs, etc...). " If it doesn't, recreate the article when you can prove that it does. ] 07:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per above. ] 19:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per above. ] 19:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 04:12, 26 September 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Wolfchild (band)
Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets WP:MUSIC. MER-C 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
So what should be done to the article, then? The appearance is good now, but I take it that the band is not good enough :) ? Well it's quite true that the band is not Metallica-big-and-famous, but it's done a quite notable career to their first album and recording deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimtuomi (talk • contribs)
- Delete per WP:NMG. PJM 11:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, maybe the band is good but they don't seem popular enough yet for an article. Read WP:MUSIC. Recury 13:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. --Nishkid64 21:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The band looks like it might pass "Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers, personal blogs, etc...). " If it doesn't, recreate the article when you can prove that it does. Kappa 07:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Wryspy 19:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.